egafd.com

The words "flash" "user friendly" and "update easily" sadly do belong in the same sentence.

It's very difficult to create a website entirely in flash that will allow the client to easily update.

lukeolson wrote:

> The words "flash" "user friendly" and "update easily" sadly do
> belong in the same sentence.


I think you meant "do not" lol, and I would agree, valid html and css cannot be beaten IMHO

Flash sites render useless a browser's Back button and address bar, and make bookmarking pages inside a Flash site impossible. Printing Flash pages from your browser doesn't work, nor does intra-page keyword searching, they eliminate HTML links' visited and unvisited colors, and that colour-changing feature is the Web's single most important navigational cue.

Flash sites may look good but they are the single most annoying thing on the web apart from Claire Sweeney.

Jaques

I couldn't agree more with your comments about sites that use "Flash." I'd much rather have my crappy designed sites that I can change, add updates to etc. in seconds than use that..

isnt there about to a shit storm of the likes that would quash katrina in a split second from the Disability Access Commission over flash on the net ? coz its not accessable by the disabled ?

Sorry if im late on this, but when i dont use a wysiwyg and use DW i write xHTML and CSS

Give me a call maybe our guys can point you the right direction, if you can show a template you like, they work in Flash, Java etc even doing payment API's at mo. I personally use Net Objects because its easy and you can do loads with it your self, it is much easier than Dreamweaver etc etc,

Phil McC