egafd.com

XNK8198 is Melanie 21

Thanks.

olimanu wrote:

> XNK8198
is
Melanie [21]

= Tracy Lords

@jj: have you noticed this post? Maybe worth a admin note against her entry.

To be fair, she looks somewhat different in the two recent additions -
you can't see the bum tat at all in Bi O; and only this glimpse in T19:
[IMG]http://img147.imagevenue.com/loc246/th_38621_vlcsnap_2017_12_14_12h12m50s150_123_246lo.jpg[/IMG]

jj wrote:

> To be fair, she looks somewhat different in the two recent
> additions -

Absolutley agreed. Especially the headshot of Tracy Lords is a bit strange.
She has a very longish face there. Is this a AR problem?

Same with this image of Carmen [23] from T19 :

[img]http://egafd.com/actresses/images/094114.jpg[/img]

Do the other shots from T19 look odd? I didn't adjust any.

jj wrote:

> Do the other shots from T19 look odd? I didn't adjust any.

I'm not a pro like you and alec, but at least Tracy Lord's/Melanie's shots: yes, in my opinion.

As for Carmen: maybe, but not as clear as Melanie.

Linda Beck I can't judge.

If the AR is really wrong, it's only a little difference to the correct AR. So maybe
I'm completely wrong and the AR is correct. I think this answer doesn't help a lot. !confused!

We'd need an uncropped screenshot to be sure about the other grabs, but I agree Tracy Lords looks unrealistic. Some models do have long faces, but not this long.

What I usually do in such cases (when there's time - a lot of pictures on this site have the wrong aspect ratio) is to go back to my trusty 1980 vintage calculator and put 540/576 in the memory, then in Irfan View look at the height (if the grab is unrotated), untick preserve aspect ratio and multiply the height by MR (memory recall). The figure 540/576 comes from the usual reason for distorted caps in that video capture programs did not adjust for pixel shape unless configured to do so. (I notice that the latest Power DVD does howsever. At least my recent caps look OK and I haven't changed anything.) However, some caps I've corrfected recently have been so way out that I've multiplied by MR twice.

The reason I asked about the other pics is that earlier in the day
I'd unchecked the AR box in IV in order to manually adjust an 'odd'
pic; and the thought occurred with these that I'd temporarily forgotten
to re-check it.
If one of you could tell me the 'odd' ones I'll re-d/l and resize at
4:3 (for starters).

I resized all with alec's calculation...
I think they are looking better now.


[IMG]http://img156.imagevenue.com/loc524/th_346670188_094097_123_524lo.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://img266.imagevenue.com/loc382/th_346670222_094098_123_382lo.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://img282.imagevenue.com/loc476/th_346671470_094099_123_476lo.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://img298.imagevenue.com/loc46/th_346672560_094100_123_46lo.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]http://img25.imagevenue.com/loc458/th_346673402_094107_123_458lo.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://img159.imagevenue.com/loc543/th_346673531_094108_123_543lo.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://img193.imagevenue.com/loc2/th_346674555_094109_123_2lo.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://img273.imagevenue.com/loc359/th_346675307_094110_123_359lo.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://img13.imagevenue.com/loc507/th_346675601_094111_123_507lo.jpg[/IMG]


[IMG]http://img147.imagevenue.com/loc251/th_334667633_094112_123_251lo.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://img104.imagevenue.com/loc77/th_133466773_094113_123_77lo.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://img252.imagevenue.com/loc522/th_334667818_094114_123_522lo.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://img43.imagevenue.com/loc46/th_346678511_094115_123_46lo.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://img262.imagevenue.com/loc504/th_346679504_094116_123_504lo.jpg[/IMG]