Page 1 of 1

XNK1093=XNK2390 ?

Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2014 3:02 pm
by frenchlover
Hi
These 2 girls

http://www.egafd.com/actresses/gallery.php/id/x01093
http://www.egafd.com/actresses/gallery.php/id/x02390

look very similar to me, and they both appear in John Love movies shot in the late 80's or early 90's
Le rousse...
http://www.egafd.com/films/details.php/id/r00192
Histoire cochonnes
http://www.egafd.com/films/details.php/id/h00373

What do you guys think ?

FL

Re: XNK1093=XNK2390 ?

Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2014 6:08 pm
by Dx.One
I don't think so.

XNK1093 has two prominent moles behind her right shoulder.
You can see them on my caps from Anale Grande:


[IMG]http://img218.imagevenue.com/loc817/th_94968_zzu1_123_817lo.jpg[/IMG][IMG]http://img202.imagevenue.com/loc345/th_94969_zzu2_123_345lo.jpg[/IMG][IMG]http://img183.imagevenue.com/loc545/th_94970_zzu3_123_545lo.jpg[/IMG][IMG]http://img298.imagevenue.com/loc584/th_94971_zzu4_123_584lo.jpg[/IMG]


I didn't see "Histoires cochonnes" but I would expect to see the moles when I look at these screencaps from VEF.
For example at 1:03:48 or 1:05:17.


[IMG]http://img251.imagevenue.com/loc464/th_572679989_HisCo_123_464lo.jpg[/IMG]


Re: XNK1093=XNK2390 ?

Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2014 6:55 pm
by jj
Dx One wrote:
> ....I would expect to see
> the moles when I look at these screencaps from VEF.

I can't see them in my copy.
Mind you, I don't see how 2390 could be described as having a tattoo on
her right hip- one never sees that part of her in any detail. She does have
a large mole to the left of her pussy.
4WIW I don't think they're the same- and the titles are separated by a few
years. But this group of films is a bit of a mess and could bear re-examination.


Re: XNK1093=XNK2390 ?

Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2014 7:03 pm
by Dx.One
>Mind you, I don't see how 2390 could be described as having a tattoo on
>her right hip- one never sees that part of her in any detail.
Maybe from the back-cover.
(but such boxcover-pics are sometimes mirrored)

Re: XNK1093=XNK2390 ?

Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2014 9:04 pm
by jj
Dx One wrote:
> Maybe from the back-cover.

Ah.
It's a mark, certainly- whether it's a boxcover blemish; or if it IS a tattoo,
whether that's actually her leg, is open to question. I think I would have
been able to glimpse it in that position, in the film.