egafd.com

http://www.prisma-online.de/bbv-net/per ... phia_loren

"...Eigentlich war es ihre Mutter, die gerne Schauspielerin werden m?chte, doch sie hat kein Gl?ck. Tochter Sofia dagegen hat zumindest Erfolg als Fotomodell. Beim Sch?nheitswettbewerb entdeckt sie dann ein Filmagent. Doch der Anfang ist schwer. Man versucht, das h?bsche junge Talent auszunutzen. Als Sofia Lazzaro wirkt sie in einer gro?en Anzahl unbedeutender Filme mit. Darunter auch PORNOFILME, doch ihr sp?terer Ehemann Carlo Ponti kauft alle Filme auf, um m?gliche Ver?ffentlichungen und Skandale zu verhindern..."


For translation: http://babelfish.altavista.com/babelfish
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Lookalike, or the LOGICAL end of the career..?

http://img195.exs.cx/img195/5333/theend ... eer5vm.jpg



And what about this early lesbian vidcap from Hardcore-DVD site ?.. Not HER again, or "unknown page" in "The Most Respectable Actress's" biography ?..

http://img136.exs.cx/img136/6603/sophia ... ene0ui.jpg

It is not early, it is '60's, judging from her look. She was very different in the beginning of her career, when she showed her tits for the scene shot for the french editions of italian movies (stills from the movie "Era lui s? si" first surfaces in the men's magazines of the late '60's). Unless we are shown a significant (and unprobable) rest, that could be just a pic showing a sign of affection or courtesy toward somebody.
That Loren, or other star, made porn and then the proof was destroyed after she become famous, is one of the most old and ridiculous legends circulating in porn. How can one start to trace "under the counter" material? And how can one hope that no copy has been made of the artifacts?
It is possible that she, or everybody else, made porn: but not just because of an insignicant pic or the resurfacing of a stale commonplace.

Thank you for the answer, Mark. I would agree with you about the pics: let it be her doubles and lookalikes, etc...; but what about the article ?..

Words.