Page 1 of 1

Raffaella Anderson group mistake!!

Posted: Wed Dec 01, 2004 5:12 pm
by zushiomaru
this is what this Yahoo! group sent me as reply??!:
--------------------------------------------------------------
This group is for activists, aesthetes, aliens, Amazons, androids,
artisans, artists, ballbusters, clones, creative folk, creatures of the
night, critics, crushers, cyborgs, dark brides, death angels, debaters,
devas, divas, dreamers, enthusiasts, fanatics, fans, fascistas,
fashionistas, feminists, giantesses, gun girls, icons, linguists, mavens,
naiads, odalisques, philosophers, photographers, playwrights, poets, posers,
pundits, replicants, reviewers, titans, vampires, witches, writers and
zealots.

It is not a photo group.
It is not an adult group.
We avoid sex and sexual issues wherever possible, although our ethos is
mildly erotic.
This is not for personal ads.
This is not for spam.
Contributing members can naturally advertise their own websites.

To access the group send a contribution to this e-mail address:-

raffaelaanderson@yahoogroups.com

Your contribution can be in any language.
It can be an original story
a poem
a review of a book, play, film, opera, piece of music
comment, opinion, speculation
original artwork
original photography
diary entry

Re: Raffaella Anderson group mistake!!

Posted: Wed Dec 01, 2004 5:55 pm
by bondurant2001
Although i recognized me as an 'activists, aesthetes, aliens, Amazons, androids,
artisans, artists, ballbusters, clones, creative folk, creatures of the
night, critics, crushers, cyborgs, dark brides, death angels, debaters,
devas, divas, dreamers, enthusiasts, fanatics, fans, fascistas,
fashionistas, feminists, giantesses, gun girls, icons, linguists, mavens,
naiads, odalisques, philosophers, photographers, playwrights, poets, posers,
pundits, replicants, reviewers, titans, vampires, witches, writers and
zealots' sometimes, it's one of the most boring and un-useful yahoo groups.
I thought it would present Raffaella as a cult actress after his "Baise-moi" character (great book, but i recommend too "les chiennes savantes" by Virginie Despentes), but it's not.
It's not interesting in itself.

St?phane