egafd.com

I see that Prince Andrew is listed in a Class A lawsuit in America as an abuser
of underage girls; he is supposed to have had sex on at least three occasions
with a 17 year old girl (a minor under US Law) specially procured for him;
also to have attended orgies with other under-age girls, so possibly younger
than 17 years, at a villa in the aptly-named U.S. Virgin Islands.

It will be fascinating to see how the loyal Press and the Establishment
generally rally round to bury this story. At the same time it seems to me that
the tale has more than a taste of the Jimmy Saville case and is in theory worse than
the public humiliation of several TV names in the past year, especially so as
these events did not take place over 20 or 20 years ago but in the past
decade.

Of course you loyal Royalists might say the story is based on hearsay and
a 17 year old is not under-age in Britain (though parental consent is normally
required in cases up to 18 years). But Prince Andrew has remained so
friendly with a convicted abuser of under-age girls in USA that the issue
largely caused him to give up his role as Britain`s Trade Ambassador.

Whad`ya think folks ? Should the Prince be given the Savile-Roache-Cliff
Richard treatment by the Old Bill or allowed off the hook ?

The girl was 17, which is underage in Florida but not in other states. Elvis started fucking Priscilla when she was 14 or 15. Jerry Lee Lewis married his 13-year-old cousin.

No case to answer.

And parental consent is not needed in the UK to fuck a 16- or 17-year-old.

In Washington DC and other states you can't drink till you're 21. If you had a friend who gave a 19-year-old girl a drink and got done for it, would you stay his friend?

A non case by the sound of it....until others start to appear out of the woodwork. Not as bad as his elder brother Charles dumping a stunner and going back to humping his fave Polo Pony...

Well according to a lawyer who she has also accused of the same crime, this woman has made accusations of a sexual nature with regard to a former Prime Minister as well.

I would imagine the Pope might be getting a bit concerned!

Neighhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

I know people who served with him in the Falklands. Smug, arrogant, twat was their description of him.

I am a royalist and don't do the bollocks that those against them do.

That said if a crime has been committed or even alleged, then it has to be investigated properly.

Will the authorities do it? I suspect yes (even with the denial going on at the moment).

Why? Because they can't afford not to.

Yewtree have executed the 'six o'clock knock' on lesser allegations, I wonder if they'll be popping round to the Palace with a BBC crew in tow to investigate this one?

He doesn't live at Buck House and I doubt the Met have the balls to do a Cliff Richard....

And he doesn't have case to answer.
Do you morons know you can make any allegation in a US court without
having to prove it.
Only out of court you have to have proof.
The "victim" has been asked to put the allegations in writing out of court and
refused.
If this was a US court I could say "Arginald Valleywater is a cunt, oh hang on !!!