Page 1 of 1

Page 3 coverup

Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2014 2:54 pm
by Porn Baron
This lady says it is part of a wider struggle for better representation, equality and human rights.

But isn't it a models human right to take a job that involves taking her clothes off?




Re: Page 3 coverup

Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2014 3:05 pm
by Arginald Valleywater
More PC crap from Thu Gardiuan (correct spelling). Have they consulted with the very well paid models who grace Page 3? What next? Mens Health not allowed to show a well built male model?

Re: Page 3 coverup

Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2014 8:41 pm
by one eyed jack
The real laughable thing about Ban Page 3 is that those petitioning against it probably don't or never read it or likely to read it if it is banned

When it is banned you can bet they'll turn their attention with their pitchforks and flaming torches to the next thing that winds them up.

I couldnt care less for Page 3 but i would defend against its banning because I hate people going around ban everything.

I don't believe in banning UKIP or BNP having their say even if they are talking bollocks because they might highlight other issues that need addressing.

Isn't that how a democracy works?

Seems they got Julien Blanc, now theyre going after Page 3, porn has been a bit of an awkward one but even the protect the children remit whlie not actually doing anything to protect the children is wearing thin now


Re: Page 3 coverup

Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2014 5:11 pm
by beutelwolf
It's not my impression that they aim for a ban. If that was the goal they'd need legislation and would have to lobby parliament.

Instead they lobby the publisher to drop the feature.

Re: Page 3 coverup

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 4:45 am
by Arginald Valleywater
And Murdoch is easily manipulated. Er no. TOFTL!

Re: Page 3 coverup

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 8:26 am
by Essex Lad
Easily manipulated over closure of the News of the World by his son and the Brooks woman.