egafd.com

Fuck me are the BBC taking the piss? I can't wait for the Peter Sutcliffe sitcom and Denis Neilsen on CBBC. The vomit inducing coverage of a dead terrorist is a vile waste of hard working licence payers money.

Now Argie stop being silly.

You think it's grown up to swear and be nasty. It isn't. You're not an extreme, right wing hard nut. You are just a naughty boy!

Blow me (up) even Gerry Bogtrotter Adams is there supporting his fellow terrorist. Bring back Enoch Powell.

Well you are obviously enjoying watching the great coverage of all of Mandela's achievements. You seem to be spending all your spare time following it.

You should be able to watch it time and time again on the iplayer. So much better for you than watching CBeebies, you know.

Thank god most people don't agree with the cunt who opened this pathetic thread.

Were you a supporter of Apartheid too? The year is 2013 and we still have these vermin racists spouting their filth all over the internet. Join the BNP you disgusting little freak.

As I said on the other thread, one person's terrorist is another person's freedom fighter. If a group has a cause that most people would deem reasonable and they act solely like an army then they are freedom fighters. The ANC were honest about what they did, the representatives of the IRA, namely Sinn Fein, constantly lied about how they had nothing to do with the IRA and hilariously claimed none of the senior Sinn Fein figures had ever been in the IRA. The IRA also behaved like gangsters and killed people who criticised them. The IRA were more terrorists than the ANC were.

I think the amount of coverage Mandela's death has got has been about right, I just think it is unfortunate it happened the same night the east coast of England was battered and submerged under the worst tidal surge for 60 years. Thousands of homes were flooded out, vast numbers of business now defunct, thousands of acres of land still under water - yet you would barely know it happened because of the Mandela story getting all the coverage. I had to watch the local news in east Yorkshire on TV (I can get it here in London) to see the devastation. I had initially heard about it by reading something online.

Had it not have been for the Mandela coverage the front pages of all newspapers, and the first 10-15 minutes of every news report, would have been dominated by the tidal surge story and its effects. Most people know little about it. The BBC obviously have to prioritise and Mandela's passing clearly deserved massive coverage - this other story did too. So what are the BBC. Sky etc, to do? My suggestion would be to devote a special half hour programme to this other story, that would go out after the main news, and to build up to it whilst doing the Mandela coverage: "we will be reporting on the very serious story of the floods in eastern England in a 30 minute special programme straight after this". Instead it just got a small amount of coverage at the end of the main programme.

I will say one thing Max,i don't agree with much of what you write,but you are clearly a reasonable person,unlike the low life who started this thread off.

LOL. This guy is just trying to wind people up. He loves apartheid, everything it stands for and has clearly nailed his racist !adolf! opinions to the the mast.

Should star in his own film. Carry On Being Racist.

So you are a racist if you dare to call a black person a terrorist?.

I am going to ask you a question Number 6 and I want you to answer it with a yes or a no. That's all you have to do. One word is all I want.

Question : Did Nelson Mandela kill/have people killed because of what he believed in.

I look forward to your one word answer.

CB