egafd.com

I have to admit, this is a question that pops up from friends to various comments on here throughout the years and Ive decided....Im gonna fling it out there cos the king of faux pas is back! (insert laugh smiley here)

The question is specifically aimed at bg porn. I did a shoot recently where the guy was openly bi and the comment came out that anyone who watches bg porn where the girl is getting fucked has to be latently homosexual.

My thoughts have always been, if you have to question it then therefore you are. I admit Ive "clashed swords" on a few occasions partying in a girls mouth in the line of duty but thought nothing of it. Its strange that people question you later about it and I have no idea. Ive never done double vag or double anal but realise the level of concentration would be required to do it

So I ask you all great contributors of the BGAFD for your pearls of wisdom to regale me with your thoughts on this

I've noticed a few comments about the blokes being ugly. Does this really matter? Ron Jeremy isnt the worlds greatest oil panting but he packs the meat where it counts.

Why is it so off putting if the sole purpose is to see that girl getting it? Does it really matter who is doing it?

Ladies and gentlemen, you have the floor...

No, I focus on the girl. Sometimes I get a tad jealous, especially of Lee Henshaw bonking Laura Hermansen so many times. I have a number of films with them both in (I mentioned this on another thread a short while ago). So gay, no. A bit jealous (of Lee), yes.

Not gay but it does put me off my stroke so to speak when the camera focuses on the bloke.

Wendy Taylor did a voyeuristic film a few years back when she worked with Kris Knight (can't remember the title) while being watched by another film crew. In the end, she fucked the bloke (old bloke, balding, glasses) from the other crew. As he was cumming, the camera spent what felt like about two minutes or more focused on his face as he wanked himself off in Wendy's mouth. Who was that supposed to appeal to? You HAD to fast forward...

So gay no, nauseous yes.

I never stop to think about the bloke but I suppose it helps to get that twinkle of lust in a girls eye if she has some eye candy to work with.

She is more than likely to go that extra distance if turned on by her screen partner. Thats always been my line of reasoning.

Although I have had the odd letter criticising that I have focussed more on the girl than the guy so that should get me off the suspect list for being gay (I hope)

Dont get me wrong, a cutaway will suffice of the bloke pre pop shot but not a whole gurning face prior to it. That would put me off.

Also I cant stand the 5 minutes of wanking to a cum shot in a girls mouth unless the girls handskills have done it. Just makes it look too pro porn as if the bloke is not into the girl...Nothing turns a girl off fast if she doesnt think the guy is exited by her. Thats half the reason most of the best girls did it in the first place, for that attention

I love to see women get ploughed by blokes with huge dicks, if this makes me an uphill gardener then so be it.

I had better go and tell the missus!! !laugh!

You are probably a little bisexual yourself? You say that you don't mind becoming a milk brother with a fellow stud???? Maybe that's because of your work? Always around erect cocks? Men and women can be straight or gay but many fall somewhere in between. I think it's called the Kinsey scale.

If i'm watching boy/girl porn, i want the guy to be good looking, have a good body and a huge cock.

Why? Because the more a girl enjoys filming a scene, the more i'm going to enjoy watching it. And chances are she'll enjoy getting it on with a fit guy a lot more than she will someone who looks like Old Man Steptoe.

Beware CB youre missus might be game on to see that. I wouldnt give her any ideas !laugh!

one eyed jack wrote:

> I never stop to think about the bloke but I suppose it helps to
> get that twinkle of lust in a girls eye if she has some eye
> candy to work with.

It is difficult not to think about him if the cameraman spends as much time (or it seems that way) focusing on him as well as her.
>

> Although I have had the odd letter criticising that I have
> focussed more on the girl than the guy so that should get me
> off the suspect list for being gay (I hope)

Always concentrate on the girl.

>
> Dont get me wrong, a cutaway will suffice of the bloke pre pop
> shot but not a whole gurning face prior to it. That would put
> me off.

Yes, me too. The film was Peepshow Special 6 and the cameraman spent an age on the old bloke fucking Wendy.

No.