egafd.com

Very interesting write up on wikipedia,some very interesting "facts " about him and others who post on this forum,bit of an eye opener! One thing is for sure he has had a bloody interesting life!

It's pretty obvious someone with an axe to grind wrote most of that entry. I don't know any of the parties but it looks a very one sided to me.

Given most of the links are about "speculative invoicing" only makes me believe its someone in that area. You only need to look at the OT forum and find 230 posts on the topic to find your answer.



Clue: It aint me!

It amazes me that someone has so much time on their hands to do all that work on wikpedia...Im just wondering when the dead rats and horses heads start turning up in the mail.

The part that really amazes me is that given all the negative onesideness of it all I notice that no one really gives a fuck...Except those who are guilty of the act of downloading and given those invoices...Oh sorry, yeah, downloaders are inncoent because ti was just there for the taking...

Someone please tell Pete Johnson of ATVOD that. Poor little Timmy was on a file sharing site looking for an episode of Peppa pig when he saw Ben Dovers DVD and downloaded.

His daddy got an invoice for it and is now on suicide watch having suffered from the depression of being revealed as someone who watches pornography on his computer...Oh the shame of it

The case continues...

He's an opportunist, every bit like the downloaders he's out to get. Not saying he's wrong of course. He has every right to try and cash in as best he can, just as illegal downloaders have every right to try and save some cash. I think when it comes to the porn producer vs illegal downloader moral relativism applies, since society generally will never have respect for those making a living from sex. If the donwloader can't get free Ben Dover stuff he'll opt for free stuff of a different label, and if he can no longer get any free porn he might just give up on it entirely, so good luck to Ben Dover, the pervy bastard.

Or, alternatively, both Perry AND the downloaders are wrong?

Just a thought.

I was a member of his site a few years ago and to be honest I didn't think there was much worth downloading "legitimately" as a site member. I think his failure is to not produce many stills. Some of his best vids are void of stills.

Some of his best vids are void of stills

Interesting comment Rodders. Some say the same about my earlier efforts and that was down to just shooting video only. You got a better video if it was just video alone

Nothing worse than a flash going off, or the sound of a drive, during a video, especially at the cum shot, when there's enough flashing to carry an epilepsy warning.

The few I did I always shot twice, once for video, once for stills, in order (to try, at least) to produce the best of each format.

Unless your shooting reality of course and its all part of the same but Ill admit that wasnt the best for companies at the time but it still sold on its own merits

People demand more from porn these days if you want a spot in the market place I agree.