Page 1 of 3

Child Benefit capped at two

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 6:26 pm
by David Johnson
Ian Duncan "Quiet Man" Smith has come up with the spiffing idea that you get child benefit for the first two children and no more.

What a wonderful idea! Child Benefit is currently ?13.40 a week for the second child. I have lost track of the number of workshy single mums and good for nothings who have had an extra child just to get their hands on ths ?13.40 a week.

Next door reckons that once they take all the third child's weekly expenses out, they are still left with ?13 to spend down the pub.

Enough is enough!

Disgruntled of Johnson Towers

Re: Child Benefit capped at two

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 6:35 pm
by number 6
IDS..real name George Smith,but quickly changed when he marrie into money and wanted to cover up his roots.

Re: Child Benefit capped at two

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 7:37 pm
by Essex Lad
One might argue why should anyone receive child benefit? Irrespective of the sums, if you can't afford children don't have them.

Essex Lad

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 7:42 pm
by David Johnson
"One might argue why should anyone receive child benefit? "

One might also argue that pigs fly and the moon is made of green cheese. It doesn't necessarily give the ideas any credibility.

If we want families to have children so that there are at least some people of working age able to support the increasing number of retired people, probably best to provide some kind of financial support. And ?13.40 a week for a second child is hardly a huge incentive is it?

Re: Essex Lad

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 9:19 am
by Flat_Eric
David Johnson wrote:

> If we want families to have children so that there are at least
> some people of working age able to support the increasing
> number of retired people, probably best to provide some kind of
> financial support. And ?13.40 a week for a second child is
> hardly a huge incentive is it?


Don't knock it David.

That translates into about 100 packets of fags a year. Or 200 two-litre bottles of Diamond White.

- Eric


Re: Child Benefit capped at two

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 9:38 am
by Von Boy
There's no need for a "benefit" to have children... it was introduced in a totally different time and country... I think people are lucky to have any benefit for having children, so capping it at two a bonus...

Also kids born in the UK and then return home, i.e. Poland are entitled to child benefit up to 16 years... paid for from the British tax payer... but I am sure no one would want to stop that as the UK is the fourth richest country in the world


Re: Child Benefit capped at two

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 11:11 am
by RoddersUK
I would abolish child benefit in its entirety. That would fuckup the Poles et al.


Re: Child Benefit capped at two

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 12:14 pm
by bamboo
Absolute horse shit.

His last name is Duncan Smith. His first name is Iain.
So strangely enough, he calls himself Iain Duncan Smith, or by his initials, IDS.

I think you are mistaking him for Ed Bollocks, who poshed up and now refers to himself as Ed Balls.

Von Boy

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 4:38 pm
by David Johnson
"There's no need for a "benefit" to have children... it was introduced in a totally different time and country"

'Cors child benefit is much higher in Switzerland.

!wink!

Re: Von Boy

Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 3:59 am
by Von Boy
That's right, just confirmed it with a local and the Swiss do not have any form of child benefit payments... you sow your seed you pay...

and as I type this I notice the Alps have had a fresh dusting of snow! the ski season will soon be back!!