Why are those growth forecasts always wrong?
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 12:58 pm
Greetings comrades. Here in the Johnson Madrassa for political correctness training and all things left wing, we have been discussing why the capitalist lackeys always seem to get their growth forecasts wrong.
No doubt you will have noticed that whenever the International Monetary Fund or the independent Office of Budget Responsibility in the UK issue a growth forecast for the UK, you can guarantee that it is going to be higher than what turns out in reality. And this has been the same for all those countries run by the right wing capitalist lackeys intent on forcing austerity on to their populations.
Now as we know in the UK, Diamond Dave and Ozzy have explained why the growth forecast has not materialised in reality. In a word it is Jonny Foreigner's fault. Or instead it was that bloke Gordon Brown who brought down Lehman's Bank, the US economy, the economies of the eurozone and Iceland etc etc. Instead of knuckling down to getting their economies going Jonny Foreigner has been concentrating on eating sauerkraut, drinking champagne, necking ouzo and fucking up our economy. Bastards!
But lo, the IMF has done a study of 20+ countries following austerity plans to try and work out why the resulting growth forecasts are almost invariably wrong.
And the simple answer is they buggered up the fiscal multipliers that the likes of the UK goverment are using. Fiscal multipliers are the formulas which say, if we reduce spending by a quid, what will that take out of growth. In the UK, Ozzy used a multiplier of ?1: 50p, so he reckoned if there was a reduction of ?1 in spending then 50p would be taken out of growth.
THe IMF has discovered that this formula is completely wrong and it is much likelier to be something like ?1: ?1 or ?1: ?1.50 which explains why the growth forecasts throughout euroland and the UK have been uniformly shite.
SO not only is Ozzy not reducing the deficit,
http://bgafd.co.uk/forum/read.php?f=3&i=261853&t=261853
nor has his economic management been brilliant
http://bgafd.co.uk/forum/read.php?f=3&i=261958&t=261958
but he is using completely incorrect formulas to predict the effect of his spending cuts on growth.
I can feel the economy "healing" already
No doubt you will have noticed that whenever the International Monetary Fund or the independent Office of Budget Responsibility in the UK issue a growth forecast for the UK, you can guarantee that it is going to be higher than what turns out in reality. And this has been the same for all those countries run by the right wing capitalist lackeys intent on forcing austerity on to their populations.
Now as we know in the UK, Diamond Dave and Ozzy have explained why the growth forecast has not materialised in reality. In a word it is Jonny Foreigner's fault. Or instead it was that bloke Gordon Brown who brought down Lehman's Bank, the US economy, the economies of the eurozone and Iceland etc etc. Instead of knuckling down to getting their economies going Jonny Foreigner has been concentrating on eating sauerkraut, drinking champagne, necking ouzo and fucking up our economy. Bastards!
But lo, the IMF has done a study of 20+ countries following austerity plans to try and work out why the resulting growth forecasts are almost invariably wrong.
And the simple answer is they buggered up the fiscal multipliers that the likes of the UK goverment are using. Fiscal multipliers are the formulas which say, if we reduce spending by a quid, what will that take out of growth. In the UK, Ozzy used a multiplier of ?1: 50p, so he reckoned if there was a reduction of ?1 in spending then 50p would be taken out of growth.
THe IMF has discovered that this formula is completely wrong and it is much likelier to be something like ?1: ?1 or ?1: ?1.50 which explains why the growth forecasts throughout euroland and the UK have been uniformly shite.
SO not only is Ozzy not reducing the deficit,
http://bgafd.co.uk/forum/read.php?f=3&i=261853&t=261853
nor has his economic management been brilliant
http://bgafd.co.uk/forum/read.php?f=3&i=261958&t=261958
but he is using completely incorrect formulas to predict the effect of his spending cuts on growth.
I can feel the economy "healing" already