egafd.com

Last night I was flicking through the channels on my telly and after Sky News and Russia Today appeared Babestation and sundry other channels of a similar ilk.

One thing I noticed was the girls never kept still. In the days of the Windmill the nudes had to keep stock still for fear of offending the Lord Chamberlain and being nicked. Is it an Ofcom rule that they have to keep bouncing up and down or do the producers think it's sexy? For me, I found it irritating and made the girls look like they all have St Vitus's Dance...

Essex Lad wrote:

> One thing I noticed was the girls never kept still.


Keep watching and you'll find that the opposite applies to certain girls. Some of them hardly ever move.

So they (the girls or producers) think it's sexy? Two worst offenders last night were a brunette called Lori and a slim blonde whose name escapes me on a different channel...

Essex Lad wrote:

> So they (the girls or producers) think it's sexy?


What a girl's doing or how she's moving usually depends more on what the caller at the time thinks is sexy than what the producer thinks is sexy.

Watched a couple of minutes this morning and one girl was doing the bouncy thing while waggling the phone at the camera. Now unless she was shouting (without opening her mouth), she wasn't being told to bounce by a caller...

When they move they jiggle.

I like it when they move. !wink!