Alex Salmond
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:37 am
Maybe our Scottish forumites can explain something to me. I don't quite understand where Salmond and the SNP are going with Scottish independence plans.
A few years ago Salmond gave Iceland and Ireland as examples of countries that an independent Scotland could model itself on. Obviously when these two countries went kaput he had to do a quick shoe shuffle and then started talking about Norway as a model.
Last year as far as I can recall, the SNP was in favour of having the euro as its currency. Now, I guess the idea of "Vote for Scottish independence and get the euro" is not the best campaigning slogan, so a new year, a new policy. So the current SNP policy is for an independent Scotland to carry on using the pound, have the Bank of England (England note!) in charge of inflation targets, interest rates etc) with the Scottish government responsible for everything that Osborne would be in control of in the rump of the UK e.g. all taxation, spending, welfare state, benefits, pensions etc etc.
Are the SNP mad? Given the economies of England, Wales, Northern Ireland combined are far, far bigger than Scotland's why on earth should Scotland be able to do what ever it wants taxation/spend wise, borrow whatever it wants but using the pound as its currency?
Just as the SNP seems to be making it up as it goes along so does the electorate. A Scottish mate of mine, born and bred in Glasgow has told me that quite a few of his friends have stopped voting for the SNP because they have got a date for an independence vote!!!! This seems hilarious but the mate's explanation makes sense. His friends liked the SNP's left of centre policies and Scottish independence was only talked about vaguely for some time in the distant future. And the UK government was around to bale out the likes of the Royal Bank of Scotland when it collapsed. As soon as the referendum was announced they started to think about whether they were in favour of actual independence.
This seems to be a case of the blind having been leading the blind but where they are both now beginning to see.
A few years ago Salmond gave Iceland and Ireland as examples of countries that an independent Scotland could model itself on. Obviously when these two countries went kaput he had to do a quick shoe shuffle and then started talking about Norway as a model.
Last year as far as I can recall, the SNP was in favour of having the euro as its currency. Now, I guess the idea of "Vote for Scottish independence and get the euro" is not the best campaigning slogan, so a new year, a new policy. So the current SNP policy is for an independent Scotland to carry on using the pound, have the Bank of England (England note!) in charge of inflation targets, interest rates etc) with the Scottish government responsible for everything that Osborne would be in control of in the rump of the UK e.g. all taxation, spending, welfare state, benefits, pensions etc etc.
Are the SNP mad? Given the economies of England, Wales, Northern Ireland combined are far, far bigger than Scotland's why on earth should Scotland be able to do what ever it wants taxation/spend wise, borrow whatever it wants but using the pound as its currency?
Just as the SNP seems to be making it up as it goes along so does the electorate. A Scottish mate of mine, born and bred in Glasgow has told me that quite a few of his friends have stopped voting for the SNP because they have got a date for an independence vote!!!! This seems hilarious but the mate's explanation makes sense. His friends liked the SNP's left of centre policies and Scottish independence was only talked about vaguely for some time in the distant future. And the UK government was around to bale out the likes of the Royal Bank of Scotland when it collapsed. As soon as the referendum was announced they started to think about whether they were in favour of actual independence.
This seems to be a case of the blind having been leading the blind but where they are both now beginning to see.