Page 1 of 3

Maybe its time for DJ to say, "I was wrong"

Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 9:05 am
by jimslip
As I predicted David Johnson is running around like headless chicken doing everything in his power to shut down every post on every thread regarding the Asian paedophile cases.

My message to DJ, is sit down, have a break and maybe a Kit Kat and take stock of whom you are willing to go do your death to defend (It woud appear).......The "right" of paedophiles from one particular ethnic/ religious group, to roam the streets without fear of prosecution.

Let us imagine what these same people you fearlessly defend would do for you in return.

Being that you are posting on a website devoted to and indeed that celebrates pornography, I would imagine, they would at the very least (If permitted) drag you off and behead you.........preumably after having stoned you to an inch of your life, or perhaps they would behead you and then stone you to death......errm that doesn't really work does it? Of course that shouldn't be a reason to damn their behavior, but something to consider, surely?

Anyway, throwing out an olive branch and to bring this matter to a close may I suggest that you bow out of this hysteria and agree that, "IT WAS WRONG THAT THESE PEOPLE WERE PERMITTED TO CONTINUE RAPING AND ABUSING CHILDREN BECAUSE THE CPS AND POLICE WERE MORE WORRIED ABOUT ACCUSATIONS OF RACISM THAN BRINGING THE OFFENDERS TO JUSTICE."

A simple, "I agree" will suffice.

There are some topics that you simply cannot rationalise or explain, they are just plain wrong and unjust. You are sullying the very cause you believe in (Whatever that may be) by pursuing this topic.

Finally allow me to declare, I am sure on behalf of ALL the wise folk of BGAFD ,that ALL those accused of such crimes, of all creeds and colours should be vigorously investigated and ALL should be charged and convicted without delay, if the evidence is beyond reasonable doubt and guilt is decided by a jury.

A simple, "I agree" will suffice.


Jimslip

Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 9:13 am
by David Johnson
"My message to DJ, is sit down, have a break and maybe a Kit Kat and take stock of whom you are willing to go do your death to defend (It woud appear).......The "right" of paedophiles from one particular ethnic/ religious group, to roam the streets without fear of prosecution. "

I love the "It would appear". Getting scared Jim, by any chance?

Quote from my message earlier today

For example Jim repeats an earlier libel here,

Jimslip quote
"you would have been delighted had the Asian paedophile gangs been left to roam unchecked,"

I have already categorically stated that I applaud the arrest and conviction of the Asian paedophiles in Rochdale.

http://bgafd.co.uk/forum/read.php?f=3&i=256702&t=256693

My message to you, Jim Slip is clear.

And for your second point, Slip

Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 9:41 am
by David Johnson
"Anyway, throwing out an olive branch and to bring this matter to a close may I suggest that you bow out of this hysteria and agree that, "IT WAS WRONG THAT THESE PEOPLE WERE PERMITTED TO CONTINUE RAPING AND ABUSING CHILDREN BECAUSE THE CPS AND POLICE WERE MORE WORRIED ABOUT ACCUSATIONS OF RACISM THAN BRINGING THE OFFENDERS TO JUSTICE."

You are going round in circles. Like a headless chicken possibly?

I have already answered this here.
http://bgafd.co.uk/forum/read.php?f=3&i=256780&t=256693

David

Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 11:10 am
by Alex L
I have tried to catch up on the various threads about the Asian paedophile case but it is a bit daunting.

Can you just clarify, are you saying that the Rochdale case was not about race?


Re: David

Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 2:16 pm
by David Johnson
"I have tried to catch up on the various threads about the Asian paedophile case but it is a bit daunting."

Yeah, know what you mean, Alex.

The message below summarises what I believe about whether religion is a factor in this evil crime by the Rochdale Asians (first half of the post) and the extent to which race i.e. Asians/white girls was a factor (second half of the post).

http://bgafd.co.uk/forum/read.php?f=3&i=256739&t=256693

Shutting down every post..

Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 2:30 pm
by David Johnson
"As I predicted David Johnson is running around like headless chicken doing everything in his power to shut down every post on every thread regarding the Asian paedophile cases."

I assume that "shutting down every post on every thread regarding the Asian paedophile cases" means my having the courtesy to reply to the posts of Essex Lad, Max, Flat Eric and Alex L etc etc. when they have posted questions/comments for me.

If this irritates you, James, maybe you could try asking Max, Essex Lad, Flat Eric and Alex L to stop asking me for comments/clarification. I suspect you may not make much progress with your reqest.

Indeed I recall how you have always had a completely different approach to those who disagree with you i.e. completely ignore those who disagree, only respond to those who agree.

I am sure I am not alone in noticing that and that OEJ, Andy, Sam Slater will also be aware that you just ignore more often than not the posts that disagree with you.

Re: Shutting down every post..

Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 2:49 pm
by Essex Lad
I am quite happy for David to respond to my points/questions/arguments. He does it in a polite and constructive way even though we may disagree, it never descends to name calling unlike some posters - see my "Calm down" post on this forum. Banter is fine - suggesting someone is "fucking mental" or "a cunt" because they have a different viewpoint is not.

Re: Shutting down every post..

Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 3:48 pm
by andy at handiwork
For what it's worth DJ, as entertaining as I often find Jim's harangues, I am unable to find an instance of you attempting to shut down any thread about anything; rather, you are simply offering a welcome alternative view to prevailing, and often it has to be said, illiberal, attitudes expressed by many not just here but elsewhere, that could best be described as 'wholesome popular sentiment'.

Re: Shutting down every post..

Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 5:53 pm
by Lizard
I still prefer to think your fucking mental, but then I'm a nice guy.


Re: David

Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 4:17 am
by william
No colour or religion - these individuals committed a crime - they had sexual relations with a person that was underage.

That is the crux and what ever colour religion or creed it was against the law on the soil of the country tat the walked. This is what matters this is the reality.

We need to get out heads out of the sand on this one.

The issues that have started due to the race and religion element - yes maybe the police didnt investigate this propery due to the fears of what would happen - the race riots for one. The inner city areas of many british citys are a fragile environment, and one that the police dont want to see kick off. So they ignore and dont upset to much.