egafd.com

A group of them have decided that Mr Murdoch is not a 'fit and proper person' to run a corporation...LOL, a bit rich coming from those thieving, lying, cheating, corrupt, self serving arrogant bastard's. There not fit to wipe his arse.

Except a lying, corrupt politician will be held accountable come an election. Not so with Rupert. I'm 36 and he's chosen every PM since I can remember.

A fucking real life Darth Sidious.

It is a fit and proper response by a parliamentary body trying to deal with the toxin in our political system that is Murdoch. And well spelt, punctuated and written I bet.

Would that they had passed the same public judgement on the abilities of people helming financial institutions.

Lizard wrote:

> A group of them have decided that Mr Murdoch is not a 'fit and
> proper person' to run a corporation...LOL, a bit rich coming
> from those thieving, lying, cheating, corrupt, self serving
> arrogant bastards. They're not fit to wipe his arse.
>
>

No, what they actually said was that he was not "a fit person". They didn't say that he was not "fit and proper" and even then it was divided on strictly party lines...

"But the Guardian has seen a copy of papers circulated to committee members on 20 March that first set out the Labour MP Tom Watson's amendment, including the conclusion that Murdoch was "not a fit and proper person to have the stewardship of a major international company".

From the Gaurdian..

Bit of topic I know, but does anyone else think Louise Mensch is hot?

Shame she's a Murdoch supporting Tory!

It would appear that that ghastly Aussie megalomaniac has been more or less running the UK for decades. I wonder if Tony Blair when he became leader of the Labour Party in 1994 was summoned to a grovelling audience with Murdoch and ordered to ditch Clause IV from the Labour Party's constitution?

Ie:

"To secure for the workers by hand or by brain the full fruits of their industry and the most equitable distribution thereof that may be possible upon the basis of the common ownership of the means of production, distribution and exchange, and the best obtainable system of popular administration and control of each industry or service."

Because it would appear that from hereafter The Sun supported and nurtured Tony Blairs's rise to fame and personal fortune. It continued to pat him on the head even when he started his vile warmongering adventures in the Middle East. Gordan Brown must have also done Murdoch's bidding and now this tradition of not so much "Brown nosing" but "Whole body immersion in a bath of Murdoch's fermenting shit" has continued through to this present day, with David Cameron.

I am delighted to see that you are proving an apt pupil.

I explained to you below last night why the Labour government did not re-nationalise the water utilities. I explained to you what had happened about Clause 4.

http://bgafd.co.uk/forum/read.php?f=3&i=256426&t=256395

First thing this morning, you chirp up with

"I wonder if Tony Blair when he became leader of the Labour Party in 1994 was summoned to a grovelling audience with Murdoch and ordered to ditch Clause IV from the Labour Party's constitution?"

Now all you need to do is to get rid of all the bonkers conspiracy theories you come up with

Since you are clearly in a receptive mood for learning from me - see my post above, I will seize the moment.

1. The Twin Towers were not blown up by the CIA in order to blame the Muslims.

2. Osama Bin Laden is not alive and well and living in Cleethorpes.

3. There is no evidence that Labour MPs bought millions of shares in the water companies which is why they didnt re-nationalise these companies.

Test at the end of the week to see how much you have learnt!