Page 1 of 1

Optical diffusion: Better?

Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 6:59 am
by Toliverwist
On a fancy, I thought I'd try a 58mm lens diffuser filter left over from 35mm film days. At first glance it seems more pleasing than Gaussian blur, or surface blur.

Apart from conversion from RAW, the image has only had USM, and some work under the eyes.

[IMG]http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l135/ ... 4-1285.jpg[/IMG]

Model Leona Queen, over from Holland
(Not British, but she's not the topic of the thread, and this is is the O/T forum, anyway)


Re: Optical diffusion: Better?

Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:24 am
by David Johnson
Like the look of this. Good idea.

Re: Optical diffusion: Better?

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 5:05 am
by Bill Malone
I think it would be hard to take a bad photo of her, filter or no filter.
Was this fashion only or did she disrobe?


Re: Optical diffusion: Better?

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 1:24 pm
by Toliverwist
******************
Bill Malone
Date: 03-23-12 09:05

I think it would be hard to take a bad photo of her, filter or no filter.
Was this fashion only or did she disrobe?
******************

Hi Bill,

Here's my gallery of some of the shots.

Leona 14 March 2012