Page 1 of 3
the UAF condone violence against women...
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 2:12 pm
by max_tranmere
Remember that nasty bunch of thugs called Unite Against Fascism? A video has surfaced on YouTube of two of these people laughing, and endorsing, the fact that a woman has been beaten up. It amazes me that David Cameran and Ed Milliband, among others, are signatories to this outfit. The former London Mayor, and future Mayoral candidate, Ken Livingstone is the UAF's leader.
Remember when the BNP leader appeared on BBC's Question Time, the UAF hospitalised several Police officers outside. But hey, the politicans still support them. Don't you think it's about time this band of nasty left-wing scum are banned as an organisation, rather than being supported by the Establishment? People's views please. This video is only 1 minute 30 seconds long.
Re: the UAF condone violence against women...
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 2:37 pm
by number 6
They are anti facists mate,what is the problem with that? There are bad eggs in all walks of life,does that mena all of the UAF members are wife beaters? Maybe you have a different agenda though eh?
Re: the UAF condone violence against women...
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 2:37 pm
by number 6
Nasty left wing scum? You mean people who despise the likes of Griffin and other racists?
Re: the UAF condone violence against women...
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 3:33 pm
by David Johnson
Once I saw a Scottish bloke attacking someone in Blackpool.
From that moment on, I knew that Scottish people were violent scumbags.
I believe these scumbags' leader is Alex Salmond.
Is it not about time Scottish people were banned rather than being supported by the Establishment?
I include a Youtub clip of these Scottish scumbags at work.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNA4GkVVHCQ
Re: the UAF condone violence against women...
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 3:38 pm
by David Johnson
In comparison to violent Scottish scumbags I show you a clip of non-violent English enjoying some typical English entertainment.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yP2u6M4Z0wY
Re: the UAF condone violence against women...
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 3:49 pm
by max_tranmere
So an organisation is not defined by the actions of its members? A few rotten eggs doesn't mean the whole barrel is rotten? When it comes to the BNP (who I condemn completely) nobody would view it that way - a few of their members acting in an unacceptable way it would be viewed that the whole organisation is bad - including by those on this forum. Otherwise I could join the BNP, be the 'good egg', and except to regarded as such, but I would not be. I would be called "nazi scum" and so on.
I have a bit of time for the EDL, as they were formed as a direct result of the obnoxious, offensive, protest by muslim extremists against the returning soldiers in Luton a couple of years ago, and because they are trying to stop the spread of Islam in Britain, which I support. I could not go near them as an organisation though becuase of those within the organisation who are regularly spoiling for a fight against anyone, and the elements who are Nazi's and who go round Nazi-saluting. But, according to what's been written on this thread so far, elements within an organisation do not define it, but instead speak only for themselves, so perhaps I should give the EDL a go.
Re: the UAF condone violence against women...
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 3:53 pm
by Dick Moby
David,please tell me when you and number 6 are getting engaged. Please add me to your wedding list. I'm sure I can get something off the internet that you can both shove up your arse.
Re: the UAF condone violence against women...
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 4:04 pm
by David Johnson
There you go. I rest my case, All Scottish people are insulting, thicko scumbags. When they are not rioting that is.
!wink!
Max
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 4:14 pm
by David Johnson
"So an organisation is not defined by the actions of its members? "
Well if a couple of Women's Institute members on a day trip to Margate got stocious drunk, you wouldn't define the Women's Institute by their actions, would you?
But if the majority of Women's Institute members got arseholed you would probably start to question the purpose of the organisation.
"When it comes to the BNP (who I condemn completely) nobody would view it that way - a few of their members acting in an unacceptable way it would be viewed that the whole organisation is bad - including by those on this forum"
I dont think you have thought about the above at all. It has nothing to do with a foew of its members acting in an unacceptable way. With regard to the BNP, until very recently, the whole purpose of the organisation was to take Britain back to the racial mix of 1948 prior to the influx of West Indians and Asians which in many cases was at the request of the UK government. This would have inevitably meant forcible repatriations. Led by a Holocaust denier, the BNP is a rotten organisation through and through, starting with its overall aims.
Re: the UAF condone violence against women...
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 4:45 pm
by Dick Moby
OK David, let's stop flirting, let's arrange a date.I must emphasise I will be giving, I'm sure you're you've been fucked before.
number 6 ,I'll leave it to you to slip him a crippler.