Page 1 of 2
The Michael Jackson trial.
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 7:49 am
by Lizard
The Americans love thier trials don't they, someone always has to be at fault. There is no bigger 'Jacko 'fan than me, I thought he was a really gifted songwriter and performer, but sadly he was also a hypochondriac, so does it really matter who injected his last dose of anathetic, he would have died anyway, and if your his personal physician, what would you gain from giving him a lethal dose of the stuff, no more paychecks? no more kudos. I believe he was a victim of his own circumstances, and this trial is nothing more than having to apportion blame to someone, anyone but the victim himself.
Re: The Michael Jackson trial.
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 7:55 am
by number 6
This is a witchhunt against a guy doing what he was told to do by Jackson. The family want a scapegoat,pure and simple.
Re: The Michael Jackson trial.
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 9:47 am
by Lizard
Exactly .
Re: The Michael Jackson trial.
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 10:30 am
by spider
MJ was employing a legalised drug pusher at ?96,000 a month!
No doubt if Dr Murray had told Jacko "no more drugs" he would have been given his P45 and shown the door.
I bet there are lost of Doctors who wouldn't mind ?1.2 million a year for looking after one patient.
The Jacko family knew what was going on, they are all a bunch of weirdos.
I feel sory for the Doc in some ways, because I'm sure it was an accident, all be it an accident waiting to happen.
Re: The Michael Jackson trial.
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 1:40 pm
by beutelwolf
number 6 wrote:
> This is a witchhunt against a guy doing what he was told to do
> by Jackson. The family want a scapegoat,pure and simple.
Yes, he was doing and sanctioning what he was being paid for. However, that does not remove his responsibility as a doctor, i.e. the excuse "I would have been sacked if I had acted responsibly" does not wash in front of the law, true or not. He took a chance, and he lost.
If you work for a chemical company and they ask you to send lots of chemical waste untreated directly into a river, then that does not protect you from criminal prosecution if the authorities find out that you collaborated.
Re: The Michael Jackson trial.
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 1:55 pm
by Arginald Valleywater
And for some weird reason SKY News are bombarding us with this shite. I work in a very large office and nobody is remotely interested. Dead weirdos are not newsworthy items....
Re: The Michael Jackson trial.
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 7:00 pm
by s rougier
Surely beutelwolf is the one making sensible comments here. If a patient asks for a dangerous drug and the doctor administers it and kills the patient, surely he can't defend himself by saying I was only doing as I was told?
Re: The Michael Jackson trial.
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 7:18 pm
by David Johnson
"If a patient asks for a dangerous drug and the doctor administers it and kills the patient, surely he can't defend himself by saying I was only doing as I was told?"
This defence didnt work for Adolf Eichmann either! Alas he wasn't told to kill Hitler, but the Jews.
Re: The Michael Jackson trial.
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 4:02 am
by spider
I agree the Doctor is guilty and he needs to be struck off at the very least.
I do think it's ironic though that the family are lining up to criticise the man.
They all knew what was happening.
I suppose the Jackson's do love a good trial. They had to sit through two of them when MJ was up for Child Abuse charges.
Re: The Michael Jackson trial.
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 7:53 pm
by awgazzm69
am i missing something here?? now i was brought up in the world of rock n roll and jackson as a performer offered me zilch, a poor weak repetetive voice and a stolen dance routine! you might fawn over him but at the end of the day guys come on he was shite!