Payback time from the Met
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 8:59 am
Apparently the Met are using the Official Secrets Act to try and force the Guardian to provide their sources for the Millie Dowler phone hacking story.
Given that the news of this event galvanised those involved in the phone hacking story and all the arrests made by the Met have been "by appointment" I don't see why the Official Secrets Act is appropriate.
The Official Secrets Act was meant for spying type crimes where national security is put at risk.
So having buried the NOTW phone hacking story a few years ago, the Met in the shape of former Police Commissioner, Paul Stevenson lent on the Guardian to try and stop them banging on about phone hacking.
Despite this, the Guardian kept at it and eventually, the truth started to come out. As a result senior Met officers like Paul Stevenson and his Deputy Commissioner, John Yates resigned.
Seems like the Met are trying to get their own back.
Cheers
D
Given that the news of this event galvanised those involved in the phone hacking story and all the arrests made by the Met have been "by appointment" I don't see why the Official Secrets Act is appropriate.
The Official Secrets Act was meant for spying type crimes where national security is put at risk.
So having buried the NOTW phone hacking story a few years ago, the Met in the shape of former Police Commissioner, Paul Stevenson lent on the Guardian to try and stop them banging on about phone hacking.
Despite this, the Guardian kept at it and eventually, the truth started to come out. As a result senior Met officers like Paul Stevenson and his Deputy Commissioner, John Yates resigned.
Seems like the Met are trying to get their own back.
Cheers
D