egafd.com

An amusing reminder, for anyone who needs it, regarding Balls specialist subject.

This particular sentence should interest forum regulars:

"He?s convinced he is right; this is a huge weakness, given that he has been proven to be 110 per cent wrong. He genuinely can?t see this - and probably never will."

Says it all about the charmless arsehole.

For strange reasons I find Yvette rather horny. Do I need help?!

"Do I need help?!"

Most certainly you do, I suspect you have come under the influence of the OldNuLiebor mind control program HAARP:



It appears to have already accounted for a number of posters on here.

""He?s convinced he is right; this is a huge weakness, given that he has been proven to be 110 per cent wrong. He genuinely can?t see this - and probably never will."

Well, those views must be exactly right. After all, Fraser Nelson is a journalist with no experience of government, no experience of economics and writes for the fiercely right wing Spectator and was also appointed by Coulson to write a column in the News of the World. So it would be foolish for anyone to question his assessment of Balls, wouldn't it?

Here's another quote for you "It's not enough just to slam on the spending brakes. Measures that cut spending but killed demand would actually make matters worse. The government has not been nearly so consistent and focused when it comes to policies that support growth".

Who said that Alex?

Was it some idiot left wing politican? No, it was the Director of the CBI, Richard Lambert, the organisation that represents UK business.

The GDP figures announced today had a far, far, far worse result than anticipated.

Who said this Alex?

"This is a horrendous figure. An absolute disaster for the economy. We knew that retail sales were heavily affected and that services output would be weak, but the collapse in construction was a major contributor to the downside surprise,"

An idiot left wing politician? No, it was the head of a finance fund.

Of course, there are some that would argue that 110% wrong Ed Balls predicted this would happen with cuts that were too deep and too quick.

Over to you Fraser Nelson?

!wink!

Cheers
D

Alex L wrote:

> An amusing reminder, for anyone who needs it, regarding Balls
> specialist subject.

For quite a while, I have been wondering whether (or rather: have been pretty sure that...) a few party activists spread their messages on this forum, trying to influence the wider public this way. Alex L just reinforced that impression.

Why?

Because Balls has just been appointed as a member of the shadow cabinet, with the next general election being years away.

In other words, nobody talks about the guy, except people who actually are political activists. Instead of talking about sport or porn or cinema or model railways or making bread or cars or embroidery or science ... they talk about politicians. As a hobby! !drink!

Nah, your like a lot of squaddies I knew. Matelots rekoned we were queer cos we fancied wimmin.

David

The HAARP OldNuLiebor mind control transmitters appear to be spot on your frequency old chap! I am guessing around 8 Hz.

As is often the case with fiercely left wing propagandists you leave out the best bits.

Here is a bit from the statement by Richard Lambert you have not quoted:

"Sir Richard Lambert, who stands down as director general of the CBI on Friday, said business supported the "ruthless" approach to spending cuts, agreeing they were essential for the long-term stability of the economy."

So...cut out the cancer of the ridiculous public spending levels which led to a TRILLION of debt for this country and we are on the road for long term recovery. David, I don't know about you, but that sounds and awful lot of money to me! Don't forget that NuLiebor achieved that from a standing start in around 13 years!

I can't comment of the "finance Fund" as that term is a bit vague.

"The HAARP OldNuLiebor mind control transmitters appear to be spot on your frequency old chap! I am guessing around 8 Hz."

I disagree with your political views. Therefore I must be mad. Great!

"Here is a bit from the statement by Richard Lambert you have not quoted:

"Sir Richard Lambert, who stands down as director general of the CBI on Friday, said business supported the "ruthless" approach to spending cuts, agreeing they were essential for the long-term stability of the economy."

Apologies for not quoting the speech in its entirety, but again you do not contradict his stinging criticism of the government. And he is a supporter of the cuts!

Here is a link to the fervently Marxist paper the Daily Mail where he argues it is not enough to slam on the breaks on spending. T

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... peech.html

"So...cut out the cancer of the ridiculous public spending levels which led to a TRILLION of debt for this country and we are on the road for long term recovery. David, I don't know about you, but that sounds and awful lot of money to me! "

Ridiculous public spending levels? Look at the graph (it takes awhile to load and then you will need to scroll down.)

http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog ... owing-data

Look at the graph and then please ask yourself the following questions.

1. Does the graph show public sector net debt as a proportion of GDP in 2008 to be roughly the same as in 1996 when the Tories had been in power for 16 years. Yes or No? ie. around the 42 to 45% level. Ridiculous spending?

2. Does the huge increase in debt from 2008 onwards have anything to do with the global recession and the fact that the government had to bail out the banking sector to the tune of over 800 billion and tax take from the sector bombed?

The quote is from a large investment bank. Must all be stupid brainwashed lefties there eh? And remember that Communist Margaret Thatcher saying "you can't buck the markets. This is what the money markets made of the figures.

"The pound came under heavy selling pressure on Tuesday after shock GDP figures were released which showed a 0.5% contraction in the fourth quarter of 2010. Against the dollar, the pound fell a huge 1.28% to 1.5783 and against the euro it fell 0.96% to sit at 1.1610.

Christina Weisz, sales director at Currency Solutions, said: "Sterling weakened against a basket of currencies before the GDP figure was announced and went off a cliff when it came out. The fourth-quarter GDP figure is a massive blow to the pound and will act as a deadweight in the short term."

If you are going to respond, please do it by discussing the issues. Calling people mad simply because they disagree with you suggests that you are a lot dumber than you seem to be to me.

Cheers
D

Not too worry,I find her tasty as well.