egafd.com

Inspired by another post and Ill admit, not the most matrest of posts made by me but certainly one that rears its head in conversation from time to time is:

Would you go gay on video for a lot of money? I just want to know howm nay people can be made to do sonthing they are not because in truth I htink if you did it for any mamount of money you must have a bit of that in you in the first place...

No pun intended

I'd do it if I was giving, but not receiving. I think I could probably put my head into an "It's a woman" mode and give anal to a bloke for a million, but I couldn't do the giving blow jobs, kissing and stuff. If it was just get hard, fuck him in the arse, pick up a million and go home, I don't think it would be a huge problem.

But never going to happen, so I can say that with no real fear of having to prove it

It has nothing to do with being gay or curious though, it's just about the money.

It's just another hole. Except it isn't because we're all loaded up with Victorian conditioning.

In ancient Greece and Rome, it was pretty standard to take on all comers -the view, logically, being that sex is sex. Most straight men today fear being gay because of its implied softness and femininity. Homosexuality for the Spartans was an integral part of one of the most militaristic cultures the world's ever seen.

I'm as conditioned as the next man but what's interesting is that what disturbs me most, personally, is men kissing. Still, whatever works for you is cool.

Question: for the million would you get to choose who you have to fuck? Jim from the Royle Family, Alan Sugar or Alan Carr would all make me hurl.

A few years ago I had to film a gay pilot show and it did occur to me before I turned up, "Oh my God, suppose I get turned on?" The truth is after an hour or so, I started finding it all revolting, I don't know why, cos I've filmed sex for many years. I think you are genetically programmed to be turned on by gay imagery.

I believe many gay men find the idea of sex with a woman revolting, so I suppose I was reacting in the same way, but just in reverse.

Absolutely no. I heard that a lot of so called 'straight' male porn stars in America did 'gay for pay' in the 1980s. Peter North the famous American star did it, although he has always claimed that at the last minute a body-double was used for the action scenes. I have never watched any of it so I wouldn't know but it would seem he is lieing and actually did take boners up his butt. Otherwise why would it be called 'gay for pay' if you don't actually do anything?

I've always held the view that porn is not prostitution because the people involved like what they do, want to do it, and also get paid for it. When someone says they did it JUST for the money then that is surely an admission that they are a prostitute - like all these 'gay for pay' people.

Jenna Jameson, the famous American pornstar, has always tried to make a distinction between 'Jenna the person' and 'Jenna the pornstar' by saying 'this is just my job'. I actually think this moves her closer to it rather than further away because inferring she does it JUST for the money is an admission of being a hooker. I am not judging her, just analising what she says.

max_tranmere wrote:

> Absolutely no.

?50 million?

max_tranmere wrote:


> I've always held the view that porn is not prostitution because
> the people involved like what they do, want to do it, and also
> get paid for it. When someone says they did it JUST for the
> money then that is surely an admission that they are a
> prostitute - like all these 'gay for pay' people.

Well, being a porn performer is a form of prostitution.
So is marrying someone for their wealth.

But then - so what? Is there some moral threshold on this subject after which people are just bad, and before which they are still good? I do not believe in one.

It has nothing to do with being gay or curious though, it's just about the money.

Im talking for that kind of money you have to do a2m, cim, owo, taking it up the tradesmans as he bags your arse like a brick shit house in the wind. the full on homosexual taste the seed in yer mouth experience and rmember it till the end of days.

Aint no half stepping. For a million quid its gotta be more than a girl would put up with for the going rate which is a lot less.

one eyed jack wrote:

> Aint no half stepping. For a million quid its gotta be more
> than a girl would put up with for the going rate which is a lot
> less.
>
planeterotica wrote:

The girls get paid an extra ?50 quid for doing anal and just watching two guys on tv kissing and cuddling makes me feel ill so im out of here !sick!

Spot on Jim.
The bastards weren't named "queers" for nothing. They are a fucking abomination to mankind. They are freaks of nature and unfortunately too many of the bastards are in senior positions within central and local govt, the Civil Service and the arts. At present it isn't compulsory but I bet the bastards would like to make it so.
For those of you who are "queer" I expect you to vent your girly spleens on me, but hey, I don't give a fuck about your feelings, so go and take a running fuck at yourselves.