The Miliband circus...
Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:21 pm
I can't think of another instance of two siblings being in senior positions in a political party at the same time before, but all this carry on with the Mili's recently proves that it is not possible to feasibly have two - especially if one becomes leader.
Basically the other has to leave front line politics, like David has done this week - because of the constant comparisons, the prospect that if the junior sibling has promise and was also tipped for the top then there will always be pundits saying he might take on his brother, might stand against him, might be sulking over the sibling getting they job that one wanted, and so on. Basically David's career in frontline politics ended because Ed's advanced, and David will have to wait for many years, presumably if and until Ed decides to leave politics, to re-emerge.
The last time I can think of a front line politican vanishing like this, when everyone viewed that person as being someone with years ahead of them as a senior figure, was when Michael Portillo left politics in 1997 - and that was because he lost his seat. David Miliband could have theoretically stayed on and advanced, but of course couldn't and didn't because of the reasons I've outlined. Politics is a funny thing.
I personally think David should have won. He has a certain cache about him, and has the vibe of a leader. They would have stood a greater chance of winning the next election with him at the helm. Who else agrees? And have you noticed how this has all got a lot more coverage in the last week or two than anything the government has been doing? It is almost like the Labour party are still the government.
Basically the other has to leave front line politics, like David has done this week - because of the constant comparisons, the prospect that if the junior sibling has promise and was also tipped for the top then there will always be pundits saying he might take on his brother, might stand against him, might be sulking over the sibling getting they job that one wanted, and so on. Basically David's career in frontline politics ended because Ed's advanced, and David will have to wait for many years, presumably if and until Ed decides to leave politics, to re-emerge.
The last time I can think of a front line politican vanishing like this, when everyone viewed that person as being someone with years ahead of them as a senior figure, was when Michael Portillo left politics in 1997 - and that was because he lost his seat. David Miliband could have theoretically stayed on and advanced, but of course couldn't and didn't because of the reasons I've outlined. Politics is a funny thing.
I personally think David should have won. He has a certain cache about him, and has the vibe of a leader. They would have stood a greater chance of winning the next election with him at the helm. Who else agrees? And have you noticed how this has all got a lot more coverage in the last week or two than anything the government has been doing? It is almost like the Labour party are still the government.