Page 1 of 1

Chloe (6)

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2001 9:17 am
by py_eater
Hey, I found she has her own website and she uses the moniker Chloe Klein, www.chloeklein.co.uk from the Pussy Eater

Re: Chloe (6)

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2001 11:42 am
by riddler
Lovely though they undoubtedly are, her boobs worry me !
They seem to be keen to hide behind her back !!

If they're implants,a refund is in order.

Re: Chloe (6)

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2001 2:59 pm
by Callipygea
Isn't it always the way? Show me a pair of fake tits that don't qualify for a refund.

The sad thing is that very few women need them. For some reason deep in their inscrutable psyches, some misguided women seem to think that larger breasts will bring them fame, fortune and lurve. This feeling is preyed upon by the butchers who mutilate them, and by the deeply perverse people who like women to look like freaks, and encourage them to submit to an expensive, painful and rarely succesful operation.

If I were Jack Straw I would stop harassing harmless pornographers, and instead lock up the bastards who turn nice looking girls into top-heavy bionic monstrosities.

Girls, if you are reading this, take note. The number of breast enhancement operations that actually improve the look of the breasts is tiny. If you doubt me, look around you.

Anyway, rant over.

Re: Chloe (6)

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2001 3:12 pm
by Shaun
If were on the subject of refunds for plastic surgery, two names spring to mind both local to myself. The only one I'm going to mention appears to have her breasts lifted way too high, any higher and she'd be looking up non-stop.