egafd.com

English judges have always projected themselves as unworldly members of the upper classes. Remember the one who said,?Who are the Beatles?? Everyone chuckled at this. Recently two immigration judges have shown themselves to be only too human. Fucking each other and fucking around as well! Even snorting a bit of nose candy and making porno films of themselves.

One of them, the male judge is said to be ?a devout Muslim? and is obviously a hypocrite who would be executed in a Muslim theocracy if the priests found out!
In England, there is the only question as to whether he has brought the judiciary into disrepute.

Is he fit to be a judge? That is the question. I think that he is still fit to do his job, in spite of his hypocrisy, and it is good propaganda that the authorities don?t sack him for moral reasons in a liberal democracy. His greatest misdemeanour here seems to be that he enjoys a good old rumpy-pumpy and loves women to be chilli red hot.

What do you think?

Mike.

You can't sack a guy for having sex, regardless of his traditional religion! However, the snorting of coke is kinda 'illegal', and judges doing illegal acts, who condemn other people for doing illegal acts kida puts him in a 'sackable' position, does it not?

Make him do jailtime !laugh!

Sam,
There is no proof of cocaine use.
Mike.

[quote]Recently two immigration judges have shown themselves to be only too human. Fucking each other and fucking around as well! Even snorting a bit of nose candy and making porno films of themselves.[/quote]

Ahhh, Sorry Mike, I took 'snorting a bit of nose candy' as 'snorting cocaine.

If I'm wrong, what else would one 'snort' that would be called 'nose candy'? Forgive my ignorance of slang for certain substances!

There is something else here which, more than 30 years after the so called "sexual equality" laws were enacted in the UK, leads one to believe that there is still a great deal of inequality.

Throughout the trial of the ex-cleaner, the BBC (and presumably other UK media) named the male judge but referred to the female Judge by an initial. Why?

To be fair to judges who ask what seem to be silly questions, it is their responsibility to ensure that everone involved knows whoever may be refered to in court is. Whilst we might be familiar with popular culture figures, there may be people in court who do not know them. Lets face it, in a complicated fraud case there may be reference to a city name, familiar to those in the city, but not to the jury or public. Just because you know who 'Gazza' is ( to recall a famous instance some years back), doesn't mean everybody does. I'd be lost with the names of 99% of Big Bro tossers.

Agreed about the law but, unless my memory serves me wrong, the male judge was named prior to the verdicts

Whilst trials must be conducted within the confines of the law, surely it isn't too much to ask that those who oversee the criminal and civil law and are placed in judgement over their fellow citizens, be aware of at least a modicum of popular culture and have some knowledge and understanding of the life of an average citizen.