Page 1 of 4
Re: Isoceles Triangles
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2003 12:17 am
by Pervert
You really are bored, aren't you.
Rhombus rules.
Re: Isoceles Triangles
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2003 11:55 am
by Onan The Librarian
I've always been rather partial to dodecahedrons myself!
Re: Isoceles Triangles
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2003 3:55 am
by Onan The Librarian
Squares are nothing but elitist Rectangles, I mean we all like the opposite sides of our right-angled quadrangles to be of equal length, but to insist on all 4 sides being being the same is pure facism imho!
Re: Isoceles Triangles
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2003 6:46 am
by Deuce Bigolo
Your all inferior to the Pentagon
cheers
B....OZ
Re: Isoceles Triangles
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2003 3:52 pm
by Rob-Smith
Triangles, squares, rectangles .... . lacking in depth
... now then , CUBES ... there's a whole new dimension..
Re: Isoceles Triangles
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2003 4:28 pm
by nosey
Forget cubes what about a TRISOCTAHEDRON?.
Re: Isoceles Triangles
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2003 4:48 pm
by Holden MacGroyn
They don't get mentioned cos they spend too much time locked away in seedy sex clubs getting exploited by cubist fascoids or cuboid fascists..
Bendy, is trendy.
Curvy, is pervy.
Straight...is great.
Personally I like circles. Some bollocks about never ending, everlasting & other Zen like philosophies.