egafd.com

In the interests of promoting a higher level of intelectual intercourse on this side of the Forum, I thought I'd raise a subject that has always fascinated me - circumcision.
Firstly, the idea of chopping a bit off the end of a child's penis has always struck me as bizarre. I can understand that there might be good reason to do so in the Middle East, where I should imagine that part of the desert packed under a foreskin would be a bit uncomfortable, and the shortage of water would mean that cleaning it would be a problem. But in the West - now, that is a different kettle of fish. Mutilation in the name of religion is disgusting.
Having been on the receiving end of both the cut and uncut varieties, I would be very interested in the views of those with and without. It's impossible to tell, but do the guys who were chopped at birth feel that they are missing out on some small pleasures? Do they feel that the rubbing of clothing on the ends of their willies has, over the years, deadened the sensitivity? Or does that fact mean that they have greater endurance?
Do the guys who still have all their bits have a problem with premature ejaculation because of the sensitivity? How do you guys feel it?
From my perspective, and I do not speak for anyone but myself, I tend to favour the uncut version, simply because I feel that there is an element of fun during foreplay that is missing with a chopped chopper. At this juncture, let me stress that I do not intend to divulge anything about Flett's condition.
There are points about the uncut version that are unpleasant - I would have thught that having something like a foreskin to play with would make the washing of the end of a prick a bit of fun, but it seems that a number of men can't be bothered. Do they have a problem with their sense of smell??!!!!!
In the final analysis, whether it's cut or uncut doesn't really make a difference to a woman - it's the mind that's on the other end of it that is important.
A really fascinating thing about this whole area is the differences that exist between the uncut guys. My first relationship of any meaning was with a wonderful guy whose foreskiin strongly resemble an ant-eater. It seemed to go on forever, and at times his prick seemed to be shorter when it was erect!!!
So there you have it - a woman's genuine desire to know how men in general feel about circumcision. And it takes a lot to make me blush!!!

lol
Katie
xx

Hi Katie, some answers to your quest for the truth here:



Liz

Thanks for that, Lizard. Some of the reasons are hysterical, some sad. And I would guess that the thrust of that website is basically anti-male, which I am not.
I wanted to know how men feel about the fact that someone, be it mother, father, religious leader, tribal head, you name it, made the decision to whip a bit off the end as they lay, helpless, in their parents arms.
I also wanted to know how men who have escaped the cut fell about it.
Maybe it's just too embarrassing.
Thanks anyway.

lol
Katie
xx

hi katie
i was cut at 18 months (apparently) and never quite understood it although was told when i was about 17 that its cos "i wouldntve been able to piss properly"...to be honest i have mixed feelings, for a start i was the only boy without at primary school and at that age u see each others bits more than u would as u get older especially at the swimming pool for which i would kind of cower in the far corner or simply be too nervous about getting changed etc that i just lied and said i forgot my kit, i was always bothered by the fact i looked different but was never really explained to why, i thought it was just me for fucking ages born different, and without wanting to make this sound like a sob story or anything but i think its PLAUSIBLE that, that combined with other things may well have led to a shyness and overall lack of confidence(bit soppy but u asked!). However i am glad that as such i dont have a foreskin cos they look a bit crap, i dont like the idea of something kind of hiding underneath seems a bit odd but there u go, lotta women prefer cut and to be honest i think it looks better, not to mention the hygiene and reduced risk of STDs...but there u go...that makes me sound very against it in a way but im q.happy as i am with it now cos i dont kno what i missed out on, it seems to be a personal preference. not bothered now tho cos im happy with other areas of that part of anatomy ! hehe. neway hope thats of some interest to u...hope it makes others post their thoughts/experiences

J


PS - i am not really well up on the UK industry are Flett / Katie names i should be familiar with

Well I was done for the same reason as IdolDroog......cos I could not wee properly! To be honest I've never thought about it.......just thought it was a natural thing. To be honest I think having a foreskin looks horrid anyway & I much perfer my cock the way it is!

ill agree with magoo here,i too have a foreskin and havent had any complaints with the girlies with it.

Firstly, many thanks for the response. Secondly, there's no reason you should know Flett & Katie, except that we're avid users/buyers of naughty movies and things, and from time to time we post individually, and sometimes we post independently.
lol
Katie
xx

By all means, ask away, magoo. I've got nothing that you don't look at evey night!!

lol
Katie
xx

re. america:

also worth checking: