egafd.com

First of all apologies for the title of this post.

The majority of actresses appear to be Orange with plastic parts and covered in less than tasteful tattoos.

I remember when we ridiculed American porn for their plastic porn actresses but at least it never looked like they cleared out their local trailer park (council estate)

I'm now finding that American porn has attractive talent who still look human whereas here in blighty...well you get the drift.

Just me?

I think your choice of description is a bit offensive and unecessary, but its difficult to argue with your sentiment.

The trend for American porn is natural, pretty and realistic. You can pretty much thank X-Art for this. They came from nowhere, took the market by surprise and are now basically responsible for a new and welcome (in my opinion) trend in porn.

Maybe the title is abit strong but unfortunately such is when heartfelt.

Again we have to face the eternal question is porn reflecting society or the industry presenting their ideals?

We have to face the eternal question is porn reflecting society or the industry presenting their ideals?

Very good question Gentleman and glad you asked because i take a look around and ask myself this question all the time and I'm always lead to this conclusion

The girls dictate how they want to present themselves and producers have a choice whether to shoot them or not.

Left with little choice some producers just go with the flow but rarely do I see producers ever making demands for girls to get tans, boob jobs, duck lips and al lthe other "enhancements" girls feel is required to make their real identity less known the more fake they look

One model told me she felt the lads mags and fashion have had a subliminal influence on this look and another producer is convinced its the "music industry look"

Some how tats, boob jobs and the trashy look goes with being a dirty porn star and the nice natural look is considered too pedestrian

Th elong and short of it all is, its certainly not the industry pushing this even if we are the ones packaging it up and selling it to you, The producers who like that manufactured look are in the minority but at the same time produce the most of

Sorry I couldnt answer your question in a simple sentence This business is as complicated as the people in it

Personally I get turned on more when I see a natural attractive woman with no tats and some hair on her fanny. I'm more excited by this because I rarely ever see it

Go X Art/ Met Art etc for going this way

Eurobabe Blue Angel mentions her achievement as being "all natural"

Besides there are plenty natural girls in the UK so its not fair to say UK girls are skanks. The rest of the world has its equal share inb numbers and the better ones will do well by default.

I could name names but you only need to look around this forum to see who everyone is lusting after to know

I don't shoot porn but finding models who are not 'adorned' with tattoos and multiple piercings is getting harder and harder.

I have no real problems with a decent boob job, but not many of the boob jobs I see can be classed as "decent".

When I shoot 'glamour' I like the models to appear glamorous and such models are rarer than rocking-horse shit.

Thanks for the replies everyone. I appreciate that there are still human looking actresses out there but they seem to be the minority or worse still start great looking and start "improving" themselves.

Gentleman said, "I'm now finding that American porn has attractive talent who still look human whereas here in blighty...well you get the drift."

I think the Yanks have their share of what you call, "Skanks".!wink!

The real tragedy is once the 'enhancements' and tats are done,they cannot be reversed easily if at all.Girls should think very hard about the financial implication before taking the plunge.From time to time you see castings specifying no boob job or large tats etc.