Shooting Yourself In The Dick.......
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 4:06 pm
Seems like rather a silly thing to do....
But the way I look at it, this is exactly what,s happening with the increase of fan forums, model listing sites and the general "outing" of who did what and where.
I know its good to share, but sometimes its better not to:) There is an old saying "A gentleman should have his pleasure and never tell" I don,t think the author of that statement was thinking of wanking over internet images when he made it, but I don,t see why the principle should be any diffirent.
The problem was highlighted by the Rachelle Summers thread. Because it was assumed she may have been naughtier than usual, she got jumped on by various "photographers" and others claimed to have seen things they shouldn't...etc, etc
The young lady was genuinely upset. She is not a diva or a prude, she is a nice girl who happily models within her levels, and is or was happy to appear on paysites, was quite open about it, and didn,t try to hide anything. Now, I doubt if she will do any published work again...and I don,t blame her.
You guys as fans want to see new girls, and maybe you want to see them go further than usual, thats fair enough and quite understandable. In the old days...and when I say old days..I only mean a few years ago, I shot literally dozens, maybe hundreds of new girls for sites like Karups and various magazines. Quite a few did adult maybe as a one off...or maybe did the odd adult job now and again. People seemed to be happy and just looked at the images, there was none of this shouting about it and spreading it all over the Peachy forums and linking to their model profiles, real names etc etc.
It worked well as far as I could see. You guys got what you want, the models got a certain amount of anonimity and the money, obviously...you both won.
Now, I,m very reluctant to shoot new models at all and would actively discourage any new girl who asked me about nude or adult, simply because the consequences for them definitely outway any benefits. I probably get approached by on average maybe 6-10 unseen girls every month..often girls you guys know and would love to see, but with very few exceptions (those being girls who are going to do it anyway, whatever I say) I talk them out of upping their levels.
Whether I shoot new girls or not is not going to effect me one way or the other, I can get by quite easily shooting established models, but as far as I see you guys are losing out on seeing girls you would like to see and the girls are losing out on the income...
I honestly cannot see the sense in all this cyberstalking , cyberlinking and trying to outdo each other by who sees and who links any particular girl first. Is it some kind of league table for it ?...is there a prize for who "outs" a girl first?
Honestly, it makes no sense...talk about shooting yourself in the Dick.....
*You, *You guys etc, is a collective term and does not refer to any particular person.
But the way I look at it, this is exactly what,s happening with the increase of fan forums, model listing sites and the general "outing" of who did what and where.
I know its good to share, but sometimes its better not to:) There is an old saying "A gentleman should have his pleasure and never tell" I don,t think the author of that statement was thinking of wanking over internet images when he made it, but I don,t see why the principle should be any diffirent.
The problem was highlighted by the Rachelle Summers thread. Because it was assumed she may have been naughtier than usual, she got jumped on by various "photographers" and others claimed to have seen things they shouldn't...etc, etc
The young lady was genuinely upset. She is not a diva or a prude, she is a nice girl who happily models within her levels, and is or was happy to appear on paysites, was quite open about it, and didn,t try to hide anything. Now, I doubt if she will do any published work again...and I don,t blame her.
You guys as fans want to see new girls, and maybe you want to see them go further than usual, thats fair enough and quite understandable. In the old days...and when I say old days..I only mean a few years ago, I shot literally dozens, maybe hundreds of new girls for sites like Karups and various magazines. Quite a few did adult maybe as a one off...or maybe did the odd adult job now and again. People seemed to be happy and just looked at the images, there was none of this shouting about it and spreading it all over the Peachy forums and linking to their model profiles, real names etc etc.
It worked well as far as I could see. You guys got what you want, the models got a certain amount of anonimity and the money, obviously...you both won.
Now, I,m very reluctant to shoot new models at all and would actively discourage any new girl who asked me about nude or adult, simply because the consequences for them definitely outway any benefits. I probably get approached by on average maybe 6-10 unseen girls every month..often girls you guys know and would love to see, but with very few exceptions (those being girls who are going to do it anyway, whatever I say) I talk them out of upping their levels.
Whether I shoot new girls or not is not going to effect me one way or the other, I can get by quite easily shooting established models, but as far as I see you guys are losing out on seeing girls you would like to see and the girls are losing out on the income...
I honestly cannot see the sense in all this cyberstalking , cyberlinking and trying to outdo each other by who sees and who links any particular girl first. Is it some kind of league table for it ?...is there a prize for who "outs" a girl first?
Honestly, it makes no sense...talk about shooting yourself in the Dick.....
*You, *You guys etc, is a collective term and does not refer to any particular person.