Page 1 of 1

900+ channels - a viewpoint

Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 8:56 pm
by sylla
Admittedly have indulged in a few suds this evening...however on reviewing the 900+ channels, would like to make the following observations;
Rachel Cole - surely Charity Dingle working nights!? Can she entice her daugher Debbie!?
Alexis Texas - Heathrow awaits your departure...please go
Sammie Pennington - Do us all a favour, get into Glambirds flicks and do full b/g, including facial...ooooossssshhhhht! ASAP;-)
Rovanna Milan - More b/g PLEASE!!
Caty Cole - An enigma...follow you're sister and go full on hardcore or shut the fuck up!
Kitty Lea - A godess! If ever one should venture into b/g then it is her...for all our sakes!
Robyn Rider - Go collect your bus pass ffs!
Cathy Barry- As much as I adore you....perhaps time to hang up your boots!
Ch 951 - Holy fuck....my eyes!!! Karina Currie, what are you doing on this!?
Lolly - Why the fuck would anyone pay to talk dirty to Lolly when you can watch her doing anything and everything online!?
Babestation Apprentice - Oh dear!:-(

Not on this evening but Charlie O'Neal, please follow Natasha, Gemma and Anna et al and progress into full hardcore.

I'd also like to add that I think LDM looks better than she ever has and a return to b/g action would be very much appreciated.

I thank you xx

Re: 900+ channels - a viewpoint

Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 8:48 am
by JamesW
sylla wrote:

> Lolly - Why the fuck would anyone pay to talk dirty to Lolly
> when you can watch her doing anything and everything online!?


Because they aren't exclusive choices. Talking to Lolly or anyone else does not mean that you cannot also watch that person online.


Re: 900+ channels - a viewpoint

Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 10:28 am
by Arginald Valleywater
The channels are in their death throes afa I am concerned, no flashes, no titilation and none of the producers take risks. Sad in a country that used to be a byword for freedom and artistic expression. Now if BBC want to do a program about upper class bummers then whahey full frontall nudity and swearing a plenty.

Re: 900+ channels - a viewpoint

Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 3:36 pm
by JamesW
Arginald Valleywater wrote:

> none of the producers take risks.


Maybe the producers will take risks if you offer to foot the bill for any fines that result.


Re: 900+ channels - a viewpoint

Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 4:34 pm
by rammie1962
These Channels, a bit like the DoDo bird, pretty much on its last legs...will shortly be extinct. I now know no one that even looks at these Channels these days. Have seen more cleavage at the local Tesco's than anything these Channels offer these days. lol Seems criteria today to be on these Channels is Lots of Botox, Fake boobs, more tatoos than can be seen at my local chapter of the ladies Hells Angels and the're much more attractive than some of the fayre on offer these days too lol - RIP Channel 900's, time to show re runs of Benny Hill..?. so much more titillating this this lot lol

Re: 900+ channels - a viewpoint

Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 9:18 am
by JamesW
sylla wrote:

> Alexis Texas - Heathrow awaits your departure...please go


Alexis Texas was a big success. Maybe in the future she'll make another return?