Page 1 of 6
Enhancements
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 8:44 am
by thealtruist
There's talk on here about Lolly Badcock's boob job of which the majority of people seem to dislike. Just curious but who has turned you off since having work done? I used to like Lolly but the tattoo's put me off. I absolutely adored Karina Currie but am really disappointed that she had her boobs done. Nowhere near as sexy as before. And Melissa Lauren. Not English, I know, but still ruined herself.
Re: Enhancements
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 10:06 am
by jj
Funny; I was watching the young Melissa only yesterday- cute, blonde-bobbed,
smiley, enthusiastic and sexy. Absolutely nothing like the washed-out looking
dyed-brunette she has morphed into:
[IMG]http://img222.imagevenue.com/loc975/th_48192_004752_123_975lo.jpg[/IMG][IMG]http://img137.imagevenue.com/loc407/th_48194_033713_123_407lo.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://img205.imagevenue.com/loc460/th_48194_12_123_460lo.jpg[/IMG].
This is why one can only view the more extreme examples as indicative of some
underlying psychological disorder. In this context her tattoo [acquired
contemporaneously with the 'enhancements']- "Quod me nutrit me destruit"-
stands starkly shorn of irony. Angelina Jolie of course has the same motto
engraved on her person- and is famed more for her fondness for the occasional
self-destructive gesture than any histrionic talent she may have : -)
Re: Enhancements
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 10:16 am
by Peter
Boob jobs, (unless needed medically), piercings (and the holes/scars they leave behind) tattoos, and 'ASBO' hair, all come under the classification "Uglyfications" and are a complete turn-off for me.
Then again, drinking pints, smoking and all the other geezer bird/ladette behaviour do nothing for me in real life, either.
Re: Enhancements
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 10:27 am
by jj
Despite the real inequities addressed by it, one can be forgiven the view that
the crowning achievement of "Wimmins' Lib" has been to allow females the 'right'
to behave every bit as vacuously and violently as males : -))
Re: Enhancements
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 2:30 pm
by HarDick
I agree about Rebecca Linares, she looks awesome
Re: Enhancements
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 3:59 pm
by jj
Not sure why you chose my particular post to respond to.... but howsoever....
I didn't even know La Linares had had hers done. I don't like them [as if she'll
ever hear, or give the slightest stuff, about my picayune opinion] and IMO she's
gone from a Perfect 10 to something a good deal lower in rank and a lot less
interesting.
As you say, I have plenty of her earlier stuff and can be content with that.
Re: Enhancements
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 5:36 pm
by jj
That's a q. that doesn't seem to have been asked: is there a girl who is equally
liked, before/after?
For me it might be Michelle B, who was bloody gorgeous when she started out as
a willowy redhead and then became a pretty impressive stacked ash-blonde....
although I was at first heartbroken at first over the silicone, the implants soon
'settled in' and she won me over again with her manic performances.
Should be called detractions
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 6:16 pm
by pbphotography
I am sorry but I really do not like Implants.
I think the term enhancement is wrong.
I do not think I have ever seen a girl who looks better with them.
To you list of ruined girls I would add Samantha Alexander,
Ashley Louise/ Danielle May, Jordan Pryce/ Alexandra Cat,
JessicaPressley.
I just am not attracted to Silicone.
Is not nice at all.
I can't think of anyone with implants I find attractive or wish to photograph them.
I really liked all of them before they got implants.