egafd.com

Does anyone know if sandie has done any modeling work while pregnant?

I think the girl might want to be left alone as she is no longer active in the industry

Amus

I thought that she'd been in the industry ''forever?''

What's so sexy about a pregnant woman anyway?
Just keep visualizing that big dick poking the baby on the head, you might change your mind after that.

Ridiculous comment.

You could say......

What's sexy about blonde girls?
What's sexy about mature women?
What's sexy about big tits?
What's sexy about bbws?
Etc etc

each to to their own bonny lad!

You can't make those comparisons, and be taken seriously. A pregnant woman is uniquely different in that she's carrying a baby, so to perform sex with a hired stud is in very very poor taste. It shows absolutely no respect for the unborn child.

@ Bicycle Bum - Totally agree with you

Eh? I'm confused! No respect for the baby? Then couples shouldn't have sex when expecting? What difference does it make if it's on film? I'm pretty sure every actress/actor who has children is disrespecting them because they will find out one day (in your eyes from what your saying)

I think that level of thinking is quite old fashioned. While it may work well for you doesnt mean it should be the de facto standard for everyone else.

Working with many couples has broadened my horizons on how people choose to live their lives and who am I to say what is wrong or right beyond how I choose to live my life.

Bicycle is not alone in his thoughts as Im sure any men beleive that once a woman is pregnant she is to be left alone.

Thing is some blokes carry on thinking that way after the child is born too then wonder why their little lady in doors is shagging the local teenager because she ends up gagging for it and wants a man with stamina..LOL

Yes Ive witnessed this too.

I didn't say a pregnant woman shouldn't have sex with the father of the baby, since the father would actually care about the baby, hopefully. I'm sure a hired stud won't give much if any thought to the fact that the woman he's poking is actually carrying a non-consenting human being inside her. The baby is part of the porn shoot, whether you chose to ignore it or not. Being inside a womb doesn't alter that fact.

To suggest it's old-fashioned to hold this view would just go to show how morally bankrupt some people are. Scotty88 specifically requested a pregnant Sandie Caine, not a fat Sandie Caine, nor a Sandie Caine with a pillow up her jumper. The only way a woman can look the way she looks when she's pregnant has everything to do with the baby. If the baby died she would miscarry, and within a few weeks cease to look like that. So, if some producer want to make porn using a pregnant woman, he wants to make porn using a baby. That's the basic logic staring you in the face, and if you have no point of view about it other than to say, 'each to their own', or something like that, then you're morally bankrupt as well.

You could also present an argument from a medical point of view. Venereal diseases and the antibiotics and other medicines used to treat them might not have much if any adverse effect on the mother, but might, just might adversely effect the baby.