egafd.com

Question:Are porn models on Facebook a waste of time?

ok,you can see what they are up to in their private life and pornstar life,but the galleries are tame because of Facebook rules.

they hardly answer emails sent to them.
i have sent Cate Harrington messages but she never replies.

Rebekah Dee is the only one who has answered my questions.

i think Yahoo groups are better for galleries,unless you are on the Rebekah Dee group which has been shut down yet again.

all these pornstar girls want you to do is join their own website at about $29.99 at a time for a month.

so who else thinks pornstars on facebook are a waste of time?

lips2mouth

You have to appreciate that these girls get loads of messages on facebook, most probably asking to sleep with them. Who has the time to answer all those messages?

LIPS2MOUTH wrote:

> Question:Are porn models on Facebook a waste of time?

Most definitely.

With the strict rules on Facebook (and quite right to) I've never seen the point of porn models being on there.

The point of models going on there is to network with other people in the industry and their friends and family (who probbaly dont want to see them past the nice glam pics)

If fans prefer to see them naked then why bother with facebook anyway?

I think facebook is a brilliant way to keep in touch with everyone and catch up with old names of which Ive caught up with a fair few before they disappeared again. Or simply got deleted.

If you want tits and fanny or more go to their website.

Lets get real guys flirting and saying hello to millions of fans is time consuming and yes more often than not its some fan full of desire trying their luck to get a shag.

I along with many industry girls class Facebook as a way of keeping in touch with non industry friends so would not encourage people to contact me that way - and I'm sure this is the case for many of the girls as Facebook is so main stream.

Most girls have their own websites and are on a handful of modelling and pornsites so why try and contact them on a website you don't like, that may also cause problems for them.

May be Facebook is a waste of time and not the models on it.
i guess the rules are there for no porn but i think some break this rule and get away with it.

so is TWITTER better?

not joined this,but hear it keeps up to date info on what each model is doing.

i was hoping that Cate,Rebekah Dee would give info but just maybe they dont want closs friends or relatives knowing what they are doing.
i am assuming that these are their real names anyway.

LIPS2MOUTH wrote:
> ok,you can see what they are up to in their private life and
> pornstar life...

No.... you can see what they want you to see and/or believe.
That's the essence of the internet, isn't it?
Peiople represent themselves in the best possible light, and the
truth goes out the window.

I have 2 facebook accounts..the first my own personal one for family, friends, my kids, gran kids etc which is fun for me but really boring to others who come across it.
My other one is one for my fans, its nothing exciting with clothed pics & a little info about me, if the people read the site & not look at the pages they find they contact me where i can send them to free adult sites with pics & some downloads etc..
As children use facebook its not right to put adult images on it, the way i see it if people don't know my face they don't know my films & as a social site (not adult site) its a great way to meet people.

Kim x

multyply is also a good social site & if done right (keeping your page private) you can upload naughty pics, videos & use the site to link bits on forums,

Facebook is for ppl of all ages and likes, so if someone likes porn then go to a porn site and not one where children are using , so i say yes models to models on facebook , but as themselves & if you want porn from them go to a porn site, not a family site. !getaroom!