egafd.com

Anyone know if she still performs in adult movies? I've been a fan of hers since I saw her in 'Sarah meets Mia' (co-starring Sarah White). I've seen some of her on the Cruella site (www.cruella.com), where she often appears with Sarah White, both under other names, but I think those pictures were not taken very recently. Does anyone know of any links to photoshoots/clips of her in action, and whether she still makes films today?

There's a real girl-girl video of Dawn with Amy (Louise Evans) at this store:



Amy&Dawn 1

I don't think Dawn models anymore.

Marlowe

If you liked that then you're gonna luuuurve this:

Thanks for that guys.

In that last scene she stars with, of course, Louise Wright (I mistakenly called her Louise White before). In the DVD 'Sarah meets Mia' which I own, it has all of the female ejaculation censored. It says on the box they are censoring it out and you can see there are bits where Mia (Dawn) drives Sarah so crazy she is about to cum and then in the next scene you can see she has just cum - from the state of her rather that from any physical evidence of seeing any ejaculation. Does anyone know why women cumming is cut out of movies, when men cumming isn't?

Thanks for those 2 links guys. Does anyone else know of any info on Mia (Dawn) ? Links to photoshoots or websites?

max_tranmere wrote:
> Does anyone else know of any info on Mia (Dawn) ?

Only that IMO she could have had a great career in b/g; the stuff she
did for Target [anal, squirting, fisting] blew me away.
Sorely missed [img]http://bgafd.co.uk/forum/smileys/tears.gif[/img]

"Does anyone know why women cumming is cut out of movies, when men cumming isn't?"

Yes because it is against the law to show women enjoying sex. Women only have sex to entertain men. Men like seeing other men come to aid their own climax which is why it is legal to show it.

How dare you even question this???

Ok ok , because the powers that be (the BBFC) have determined through medical advice that female ejaculation is pissing because they refuse to believe that the onset of a womans orgasm can cause this phenomenon.

So I'm not far off in my original explanation

Anway, whats wrong with a bit of pee? I just had a bird shoot in my face last week on a shoot which was funny

I think she had her first "judder" (of many it seems)

Oh by the way , my scene is not censored. Enjoy.

The reason the BBFC know so little [you might say nothing] about sex
is because they are all so repulsive-looking and utterly charmless that
no-one has ever, even remotely, contemplated doing the nasty with them.

This is fully in accordance with NooLab's so-far wildly successful policy
of putting people in charge of things about which they have absolutely
no knowledge.
I just hope an MOD johnnie hasn't got his finger on the nuclear-button....

Oh come now JJ do yo ueven know what the folk at the BBFC look like? They could be well hot for all you know.

Looks have nothing to do with it so lets not get personal now. They look like normal folk to me. I know. Ive been there and met some of them in person.

one eyed jack wrote:
> the folk at the BBFC look like? They could be well hot for all you know.
Somehow, I find that VERY hard to believe : -))
I don't know any of them since James Ferman retired. The mere fact that
they're Government appointees predisposes me to scepticism, however;
not biting the hand that feeds, and all that..........JF always trod a fine
line, and credit to him for that.


> Looks have nothing to do with it so lets not get personal now.
If they seek to interfere in my personal life, then who's making it personal?


> They look like normal folk to me.
So do most serial-killers.


I can't understand the 'logic' that apparently says we may be treated as
discriminating adults in terms of the violent entertainment we wish to
view, but not the sexual entertainment. We already have a personal
censorship system- it's called an 'off'-button, or a closed wallet.
The whole premise is flawed anyway, as it is not and never has been the
business of Government or its offshoots to dictate to us the nature of
moral choice. By all means legislate for children, but beyond the limit of
whatever is currently deemed as Majority, leaves us alone.