Sarah Daykin interview on TV last night...
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 12:24 pm
On the Playboy Channel last night (Tuesday) there was a 30 minute interview with Sarah Daykin. She was saying she has quit hardcore, that what she did was a 'job' and how she has never orgasmed on camera. She also said that as it is all staged (real sex obviously, but a false-setting not like in your private life) that she seldom got turned on. She also said she is not remotely bi-sexual, but obviously did girls on camera.
We then had the inevitable reference to what her family thought. I always find porn stars and porn film makers' words when this question arises rather inconsistent with other things they generally say and do. This doesn't apply to Sarah specifically but in general. Sarah said she couldn't go back to hardcore because of the effect it would have on her family. This impiles that they not only knew but knew and were horrified by it.
I've never heard Sarah say anything else about the view of her family with regard to her being a pornstar, but when people say things like 'its just a job' and 'its how I earn my living', what one does 'at work' - and the fact the protagonists are 'actresses' etc, it all sounds very clean, ordinary, and sanitised. If thats the case - its all very 'normal' - why would their nearest and dearest be bothered?
Before people say 'its obvious why' - it is to me too - but they imply it is not something odd, 'just my job'. I saw pornfilm maker Omar Williams asking someone once about it in an interview (the parents view). The person said 'they don't like boy-girl'. 'Why', he asked? genuinely puzzled. 'Are they squares or what?' was his next question. So many porn people see it as so normal. If this was genuinely just a normal job for Sarah (like nurse, chef, maid, pilot), why would the parents be bothered?
Her saying that her parents freaked, and her NOT saying it was weird for them to do so, sounds like a subtle admission by her that maybe her 'career' WAS something bad to do. Anyway, back to what I was originally talking about: did other people see the interview, and what did you think about it. And does anyone know what she is doing now?
We then had the inevitable reference to what her family thought. I always find porn stars and porn film makers' words when this question arises rather inconsistent with other things they generally say and do. This doesn't apply to Sarah specifically but in general. Sarah said she couldn't go back to hardcore because of the effect it would have on her family. This impiles that they not only knew but knew and were horrified by it.
I've never heard Sarah say anything else about the view of her family with regard to her being a pornstar, but when people say things like 'its just a job' and 'its how I earn my living', what one does 'at work' - and the fact the protagonists are 'actresses' etc, it all sounds very clean, ordinary, and sanitised. If thats the case - its all very 'normal' - why would their nearest and dearest be bothered?
Before people say 'its obvious why' - it is to me too - but they imply it is not something odd, 'just my job'. I saw pornfilm maker Omar Williams asking someone once about it in an interview (the parents view). The person said 'they don't like boy-girl'. 'Why', he asked? genuinely puzzled. 'Are they squares or what?' was his next question. So many porn people see it as so normal. If this was genuinely just a normal job for Sarah (like nurse, chef, maid, pilot), why would the parents be bothered?
Her saying that her parents freaked, and her NOT saying it was weird for them to do so, sounds like a subtle admission by her that maybe her 'career' WAS something bad to do. Anyway, back to what I was originally talking about: did other people see the interview, and what did you think about it. And does anyone know what she is doing now?