egafd.com

For me, and I think in general, anything less than solo insertions is a non starter foe a girl wanting to make money.

There is a big market for non nude "tease" content at the moment... but you've got to find the right girl.
Just take a look at some of the US sites featuring college girls.

The easy thing would be to have a look through the top shelf titles as an idea of whats requiredor publication, I disagree that 'toys' are a minimum, but it depends on each photographers market

Payment will vary quite a bit depending if its a full day/half day, for publication etc, and I can't what others pay.

As for people shooting for the internet only, I would suggest SimonD would be a good guide

And may I be the first to say...

Don't forget that the people of the forum would be keen to see the results!

Good luck!

Photo-taker, any girls you know who only want to do topless, get them to send me an email on info @ onlytease.com - we only take the best lookers but if they are cracking we would definetly be interested.

Cheers

Paul

photo-taker wrote:

> A girl has phoned me about the life span of the images, in a
> mag may last a few months , but always on record, but the net
> goes on and on ...may not help her if she leaves Uni , with a
> Degree, and a CV of great pics ... taken now but then will be
> 3-4 years time...
>
> any thoughts ...

The pictures are going to be around virtually forever, if she can't cope with that, or is worried they'll appear in the Sport when she becomes a footballers wife, then its best not to pose for them in the first place.

Agreed.

Just look at the Colour Climax and Rodox sites. All their magazine material from the 70's is there 30 years on.

And someone, somewhere is scanning magazine sets too. You can find pretty much every Mayfair set ever published on the net so no safety there.

Having said that, they might do it, love it and spend a career making money and building an empire from it, and still have time bed a footballer or two. If they can say "so what?" then do it.