egafd.com

Hi all,

We are making the second series of a show called 'Without Prejudice' for
Channel 4.

People on the show are from all walks of lives and we are interested in
their opinions, beliefs and values.

We are keen to get a couple of porn stars to take part in the show. They have to be prepared to have their lifestyles, beliefs and opinions discussed by a panel of 5 ordinary people who will show no prejudice.

Although we cannot pay them, the winner walks away with ?20,000 and will only require one day in the studio.

Hopefully this will be of interest to a number of the girls who log onto BGAFD and we look forward to hearing from you.

To find out more please email me at maw@12yard.com and I will call you back.

Hope to hear from you soon.

Regards,

Matt

Matt Wilkinson
'Without Prejudice'
12 Yard Productions

what will you do for ?20,000 (or the chance to get it)?

Shag the whole panel...lots of times

No prejudice?
Don't make me laugh: there are vanishingly few people without prejudices (and these would be too intelligent to find taking part in such a spectacle at all appealing), so all I can assume is the poor victims (sorry, 'participants') will be subjected to a treatment rather worse than the Flavian Ampitheatre, or one of Mr Paxman's finest, by a bunch of Council-estate Yahoos.
As Joe said, it's all about 'how much shit am I prepared to let the meeeja morons put me through, for the dosh?'

Well we know who'll win this then................er.............MISS RAMPTON!

Matt,
you e-mail address does not appear to be working, please can you provide contact details as a young lady would like to speak to you. thanks

I may be wrong, but I think the first series was spelt 'Without Prejudice?', with a question mark.
Sensibly too. Matt doesn't seem to have explained the concept of the show very well - for anyone who didn't see the first series, six random people are interviewed in turn by a panel of 5 from all walks of life.
Several 'rounds' of panel discussion take place on thequestion of who should receive the cash. They decide on a purely arbitrary basis and can bring all their prejudices into play should they wish.
"He shouldn't get the money because: he has an earring, she is a single mum, he is a Christian... etc etc"
Any reason for denying the cash is valid, provided a panel member can convince the rest of the panel. You can imagine the fun they'd have with a 'pornstar', and that, no doubt is why the production company is so keen to involve us.

So, go in for this by all means, and good luck to you, but be aware of what you're letting yourself in for.

if I had ?20000K i wold spend it all of DVD'S and a SUROND SOND!!!!!!!!!!

then it wold be like i was in the MIDEL of SEXXX!!!!!!!!!!!

ie I WOLD NO LONGER JUST BE A "SPECTATER"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!