Has Copyright owners actions affected your choice?

[one eyed jack]

Gents Ive said all Ive got to say on this matter. You know where I stand. the floor is yours.

[Hickster]

So have I.

I will see what I can do about getting someone for the interview for you..

Personally I think it would be a Joe Pesci moment from Goodfellas if it was me, but I will see what I can do!

Thanks again for your time Terry, we may meet in another life brother!

[one eyed jack]

I'm all for that Hickster !happy!

[bpaw]

@OEJ

It is the case that you are known and make the effort to give an opinion. Admittedly you have made this decision long before posting replies on this thread. With that, I appreciate your posts. You do try to give an honest opinion, and it is only now that you are uncomfortable with our anonymity. Yes this was our choice from the start to be anonymous, and it is your choice if you are now unwilling to participate this way. Do bear in mind that you knew this when you started.

Effectively, I have NO personal gain from doing what I do. If what GEIL are doing failed, I receive no reward. I have no interest in appearing in front of a camera simply because I might have trust in you, but not many others in that arena.

Me and Hickster were innocent of what we were accused of. There was a reason, which we found evidence of. I can say myself the terror receiving the LoC put on my family. I don't want more innocent people to experience that.

Unfortunately, sadly, this situation continues.

[one eyed jack]

I feel you could put that across better and to a wider audience by having it documented which is why i asked

My motive is merely to collect footage that shows the experice of those in a business everyone may think is easy by virtue of what it is we are known for and the illusion of what we are selling

I respect your decision to decline. Just thought Id try. My whole career is based on asking and people saying yes or no LOL

[one eyed jack]

I'm probably going to go ahead and do it anyway if Julian agrees to discuss it. Ill just say I put it out there for anyone to speak to him direct but no one wanted to come forward

Thats the truth right?

This is pivotal to me because this has about as much relevance to what is goig on in our business anyway. I was doing the decent thing by including critics to come forward

That offer still stands as well as Im sure Julaian would prefer to do one decent one that can be referenced than field the same questions a hundred times

[Hickster]

Yes tell him what you like, the circumstances are not conducive though.. He has still not responded to my post here... http://acsbore.wordpress.com/2012/06/28 ... an-becker/

If he cants respond to that why does he expect to control the issue? He mate false statements that he needs to respond to, he hasn't. What is the point in one of us doing an interview that is controlled by one of his friends?

I don't see any currency in doing that myself. As I have said before, we tried to do that before with Andrew Crossley, the BBC attempted to arrange such an interview and he bailed out, TWICE. If it were a BBC show and it may well be so next year, we will see how eager he is to take up such an interview in a neutral environment.

I don't think he would!

But please, explain the reasons he told you, post them here, WHY DOESN'T he come on here, and for me, why wont he address the comments I have made that shows the world he has not been truthful? I even included the source article on my blog post.

http://acsbore.wordpress.com/2012/06/28 ... an-becker/

I am guessing he knows about my Blog... Right?

[one eyed jack]

The whole point of my documentary is to tell the truth. If I was filming a pack of lies I wouldve finished it a long time ago. In this age of deceit I dont blame you for not trusting me. After all, you have no idea of the calibre of person I am

But every once in a while you just have to take that leap of faith in a human being.

You do it when you fly in a plane, take a train or a bus

I understand his reasons for not posting on here if he can have a wider audience than just a forum. Hes just exercising his choice not to discuss matters concerning this on here.

Im offering you a chance to get your questions answered in person/ face to face with an audience for a Q&A on this topic. I'd say thats better than talking about it on any forum

I hope you are not implying there is any underlying threat to your personal safety on this

Contrary to popular belief pornographers aint gangsters LOL Or should I be more concerned for Julians safety?

[Hickster]

"I understand his reasons for not posting on here if he can have a wider audience than just a forum. Hes just exercising his choice not to discuss matters concerning this on here."

In other words he wants total control of the medium. That is why he only talks to Porn sites, as far a interviews are concerned? Hmmm

"Im offering you a chance to get your questions answered in person/ face to face with an audience for a Q&A on this topic. I'd say thats better than talking about it on any forum"

I dont really need my questions answering, I already know the system that Becker is running, So does the House of Lords so does the BBC and pretty much everyone else who takes an interest in this. It is Becker who seems to think he can pull the wool over peoples eyes not me. GEIL will be awarded the NPO, but so what? so were all the other "Copyright Trolls" who tried this. It is what happens AFTER that, when he sends his letters out in the New Year, not even then, it is what happens when he sends out the SECOND letter, and the third and the fourth, and then the questionnaire asking who lives at the house where the alleged infringer lives, and asking for details about their family that is when it will become more interesting (and outside the Court scrutiny) and when the Mainstream Media will start to take notice.

"I hope you are not implying there is any underlying threat to your personal safety on this" Contrary to popular belief pornographers aint gangsters LOL Or should I be more concerned for Julians safety?

Please read what you wrote, you SERIOUSLY think he would be at a greater risk than myself? Hmm I guess you skipped over the bit in the previous post that mentioned that his previous Legal Counsel tried to SUE me?

See here the link Please read, http://torrentfreak.com/lawyers-warn-wo ... og-100610/

I would like you also to address the Wikipedia link with reagard to Lindsay Honey, another think you skipped over, TWICE now.

[one eyed jack]

Forget about it then. Just thought Id put the offer to you but youve succesfully tried to make my intentions look sinister and irrelevant.

Ill proceed as normal then. If anythng comes out of it the other end then we can take it up with other people who wont have problems opposing it publicly

I find it insulting that you suggest Julian would control my film but again I can see why you would think so given my views so far.

Bear in mind if you choose to treat me with contempt then I could also do the same as I know nothing about you other than you are a facesless victime whose argument may have more legs if you put a face on it and stand up for your beliefs

i wouldve thought you'd relish the chance, even if you was to suggest hiding your face.

I certainly agree with Julian now why he wont answer your questions on a public forum. Why should he?

Ive discussed with him at length my concerns about this and he seems fortcoming enough whereas I have no idea who you are at all except t say you are, maybe quite rightly angry about what happened with ACS Law