Page 10 of 13
Re: 'Fiona Cooper' avoiding R18 Certification
Posted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 6:35 am
by ec444
If you look on the BBFC site there are some Fiona Cooper films that have been given a certificate. so they must have caught up with him at some point. For example this one:
http://www.bbfc.org.uk/website/Classifi ... enDocument
If avoiding R18 makes them cheaper then that's good, but it seems a little unfair on those that do pay. It seems odd that he gets away with it as Fiona Cooper must be one of the most popular adult film suppliers.
Re: Fiona Cooper
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 1:16 am
by steve40
Is the StormChild guy on here a new version of "Fiona"?
He seems to give up, come back, give up, come back alot and he also seems to be in it to fuck models. In his words "Fat bloke no neck fucks Cate Harrington, Vicki Peach and a few others."
He doesn't sound like a particular trustworthy person to be working for and appears to be in it for the wrong reason.
Re: Fiona Cooper
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 6:19 am
by stiffoak571
Stormchild/Matt is a great bloke!
At least he is honest (unlike others mentioned here) is certed he runs a proper site (ie not just for personal use) and there is often a hint of irony in what he says which goes unnoticed.
None of the girls I met who work with him have a bad word to say
It is just that he is not a "stud" and appears grateful for the opportunities which I think is a wonderfully endearing trait.
Re: Fiona Cooper
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 2:33 pm
by sparky
LIPS2MOUTH wrote
I think this thread is getting divided into those who want FC closed down and those who want FC to stay.
If all at Fiona Cooper can "get away with it" for so long.then why does`nt other companys do the same?
many do.
you can post anything in a plain brown envelope these days and it never gets checked.
Given Fiona Cooper are one of, if not the, biggest adult DVD distributor in the UK it ought not be difficult for the authorities to place an order then once received and found not to be certified find the source and those in involved, it is hardly a garden shed operation.
Why has this not happened?
Why have the BBFC not got involved?
Some of the far smaller operations that have been prosecuted must have been harder to chase through a chain of PO Box numbers, forwarding addresses etc.
I am not saying I want the company shut down but I do want them be pulled up if they do not adhere to the law regarding BBFC certification or any other aspect of business law.
Re: Fiona Cooper
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 2:50 pm
by davyboy
Sutcliffe a multi-millionaire - well you wouldn't think so looking at the decor and tat in the background of scenes that he shoots. If he is he should buy some better equipment to shoot the models with, he has 'heavies' find that hard to believe, like he needs 24/7 all around protection. Yeah right.
Re: Fiona Cooper
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 3:27 pm
by LIPS2MOUTH
hi,
is it an offence to receive porn through the mail?
i always thought FC got away with the R18 because there was no sex or hardcore in the old days just girls with toys.
but now this cock sucking is gone a bit futher.does this mean harder censorship?
what actually qualifies for R18?
Re: Fiona Cooper
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:58 pm
by fatcharlienancy
I've been following this thread with interest for some time now and have decided to put forward my two pennies (for what they're worth)
I used to be a regular customer of FC until i found out exactly what sort of individual i was giving my money to. To be fair, as soon as i asked to be removed from the mailing list i was, and i've not received any correspondence since.
As far as the product is concerned - ten/fifteen years ago where could you get stuff like that cheaply and legally in this country, particularly with the huge selection of models that we all knew and loved?
But today? I realise that a gig is a gig and the girls who still show up halifax have got a job to do and a crust to earn. But really, why would any punter want the same old shit anymore when we've got access 24/7 to as much and better quality product on this internet thingy that seems to be all the rage?
It's not rocket science my friends - if you don't want to keep a nonce living in the lap of luxury stop buying his product, get your porn on the net and sleep with a cleaner conscience. There's not a glamour model in Britain who's gonna starve if this particular company goes bust. And judging the state of the economy, now could be the time to see Fiona, Chloe and the Elves picking up their p45's at long last.
It's not in the hands of Sutcliffe - he's gonna carry on churning this stuff out as long as he's got a market - it's in the hands of punters like you and me.
Do as you will...
Re: Fiona Cooper
Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 5:55 am
by LukeLangley
I was going to order a dvd from this company as there's a girl I want to see more of.
HOWEVER, now I know who runs the company, I've decided not to part with my money.
This creep/perv NEEDS to be shut down ASAP. As for having "heavies", he probably has them so no-one kicks the shit out of him which he deserves
Re: Fiona Cooper
Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:55 am
by Floydoid
LIPS2MOUTH wrote:
> hi, is it an offence to receive porn through the mail?
Not sure, but it is an offence to send it through the post.
Re: Fiona Cooper
Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 2:04 pm
by Kyle Richmond
Surely just using toys counts as hardcore, hence the fact even penetration with toys isn't shown on Tvx or adult channel on the tv.I think from day one the models used toys, but some would only pose or dance. Don't think Amanda Long or Teresa May used any toys or fingers in their solo or joint titles .Just seen an Amanda DVD with Sammy Walker, no toys or licking involved.