Page 9 of 12

Re: Terminal Decline

Posted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 4:34 pm
by jimslip
Your words which I have read and re-read:

"Two of the biggest companies in this country turned me down last year - why ? Because they stated that they were happy with who was already shooting for them - TWATS !"

It seems pretty clear what you mean.


Re: Terminal Decline

Posted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 6:16 pm
by Dave Wells
Yes, Dave exactly like I said above. It's the company that are the twats not the people shooting for them !

Stop splitting hairs for fucks sake.


Re: Terminal Decline

Posted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 6:20 pm
by Dave Wells
Ha, I couldn't give a toss now could I.

I've never been a arse licker and that's probably the real reason why I not in the loop !

Anyway, I've finished this stupid game of typed tennis now.

Enough already !


Re: Terminal Decline

Posted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 6:43 pm
by BigMattyP
As far as I can tell, I am not sure that the entire industry will fold in on itself in Terminal Decline.
I reckon people will always want porn and I agree with an earlier comment from Jack I believe that, itunes hasn't gone bust as most people are prepared to pay for what they want. I might be being naive but I think that as long as you are prepared to speculate a little and produce some content that is different, most people will pay for it. Maybe I am wrong but as I have said before, I am taking this as a kind of expensive hobby at the moment with a view to ramping it up if it ever seems like it wants to fly.
I will certainly never remortgage my house to pursue this and will only shoot a max of one or two models a month (slowly slowly you must go to catch a monkey). Having said that though I still think that because I will never be as big as some of the really glossy companies, my content will slip under the radar of a lot of the proper pirates? Maybe not but only time will tell.


Re: Terminal Decline

Posted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 9:16 pm
by one eyed jack
Oh so now everyone who is doing moderately ok has to have licked arse to get somewhere now eh?

How about hard work, investment, stress then more hard work to get somewhere in life?

You dont have to lick arse either Dave and if you did Im not sure the person whose arse you are licking would approve if they are not into a bit of rimming, especially if that person is a bloke.

If you had a pony tail wig and a cute pink skirt and freckles maybe......


Re: Terminal Decline

Posted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 11:16 pm
by belfast_birty
You'll need to try it.If you point a movie camera at a screen showing the hilm,you'll hardly get HD.Steganography involves weaving the film with some quite complex algorithms.It's not for the technically challenged.

Re: Terminal Decline

Posted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 11:21 pm
by belfast_birty
DW-the 'twats' that you mention,will be gone soon,in this climate,unless thery reaslly know how to run a business(eg sell product for more than you pay for it,ensure legacy income etc....)

Re: Terminal Decline

Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:57 am
by Dave Wells
Fuck me, you lot are like vultures aren't you !

Again that wasn't what I meant Terry. But just coz I'm a nice guy I'll explain (again).

Firstly (OBVIOUSLY) I meant metaphorically speaking. Anyone who has done what you are suggesting is an idiot ! But nobody has of course so no one is an idiot so don't have another go back ! Mine was an insinuation that certain people have done the metaphorical route to get to their current standing. Nuff said, full stop, end of !

As for the hard work bit, well all it seems to have got me is on here argueing with you lot !

I wouldn't even know how to 'metaphorically' of course arselick.

And I have freckles !


Re: Terminal Decline

Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 4:00 am
by planeterotica
belfast_birty wrote:

> You'll need to try it.If you point a movie camera at a screen
> showing the hilm,you'll hardly get HD.Steganography involves
> weaving the film with some quite complex algorithms.It's not
> for the technically challenged.

planeterotica wrote:

I accept that there will be some loss of quality by copying in this way but a lot of people wont mind that if they get the product a lot cheaper or for free, you can purchase copying kits i have a basic one for transferring old 8mm and if you use a good HD camera then the loss of quality is only minimal.


Re: Terminal Decline

Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 7:03 am
by Dave Wells
P.s Terry for the forty thousant fucking time of telling you I wasn't upset about being not invited to the boys club at all. I couldn't care less. My gripe was that I was just thrown off the UKAP website after joining in very constuctively with 'inside industry debates' because technically I wasn't a producer. You have named all those that wanted me out already privately and yes they really are TWATS.