MODELS : PLEASE READ THIS WARNING, it's IMPORTANT

[Emily Cartwright]

Snow Patrol wrote:

> Yeah, I know that, but its not the answer to the question Im
> asking.
>
> I said, 'I'm asking if there would be a problem with 9
> onlookers, who are doing nothing whatsoever to contribute to
> the overall outcome of shoot ?
> '
>
> Its not a trick question or anything. I'm not trying to be
> funny, or to catch you out somehow. I'm genuinely interested in
> your answer.
>
> Just a simple Y / N will suffice...

Yes, there would obviously be a problem with that.

[Snow Patrol]

OK, so last question.
Would there be a problem with one?

One person being present who was in no way influental to the sucsess of the shoot?

[Emily Cartwright]

'Snow Patrol wrote:

> OK, so last question.
> Would there be a problem with one?
>
> One person being present who was in no way influental to the
> sucsess of the shoot?

Well that really depends. If that person has come to drink beer and watch a 'live sex show', as you put it, then yes, obviously there would be a problem. If that person keeps out of the way and doesn't interfere with the shoot in any way (such people have been brought along by photographers on two or three dozen of the shoots I've been on, wives, girlfriends, colleagues and so on, and there's never been a problem) then why not.

It's not a requirement for everyone to have a positive influence on the outcome of the shoot - as long as they don't have a negative one (i.e. as long as everyone's happy with their presence) then I don't see why they shouldn't be there.

[Snow Patrol]

OK thankyou.
End of questions