Page 9 of 12
Re: STI's & Rumours
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 8:33 pm
by Cenobitez
I thought Sams was about ?
Re: STI's & Rumours
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 6:02 am
by Jacques
Especially when 6.5% of a popular website openly advertise bareback sex.
Re: STI's & Rumours
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 7:25 am
by Cornish Chris
According to X-Biz confirmed totals are now 12 diagnosed as infected with Syphillis.
Worst of all is this thread were there are "rumours" of untested EE's filling in whilst the shutdown takes affect....now that is scarey !shocked!
Re: STI's & Rumours
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 10:41 pm
by Deuce Bigolo
Interesting dicussions CC
The more I read the more I think its about time the industry did its housekeeping in private
All these anonymous posters with hidden agendas to keep their thoughts to themselves rather than starting the usual Witch Hunt
Re: STI's & Rumours
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2007 9:17 am
by one eyed panda
You can guage how many girls do bareback by going to Adultwork, using the search facility to find bareback or unprotected sex.
You can also check anal/anal at discretion and bareback together.
The percentage is alarmingly high, and Adultwork inadvertantly promotes bareback by allowing girls to include it in their services and for guys to search for it.
Bareback is supposed to be a nono in parlours but most guys who punt have been offered bb in a parlour at some time. More upmarket escorts generally don't do it.
The risks of uncovered oral sex are less well understood though, and that is a normally accepted risk, although its easier to combat by both parties using listerine or similar before or after.
I have a distinct feeling from this thread that the top end of the escorting scene has a better grasp of sexual hygiene than the film scene. I can't believe the distinction between spermicide and 'biocide' has been so widely misunderstood.
STI's TEST CONSISTANCIES
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2007 10:54 am
by CandiceParis
Hi ALL
We are NOT going to comment directly or indirectly on ANY of the above postings, HOVEVER, we would say there are a lot of inconsistancies in the Test Certs provided to us from Performers & Indeed to me as a Performer.
Only today we received a email from a London Clinic giving details of the results of a female performer (we will not provide her details).
We requested her results as she we will be working with others who have worked with her. We had been told that she suspected she had something, later she advised that she did not. And according to her Cert she was given the all clear.
BUT upon reading the email, we found that:
There was NO letter head
The email was sent at 2am
BUT more concerning to us, was these "test" showed as clear (negative)but there was fundermental gap in the tests. Neither her Throat or Recum had been tested for a STI.
Many many performers would accept this cert, but WHY??
Tests should be COMPLETE, & not testing the throat & rectum can give a false negative.
Until we ALL insist on STANDARD & COMPLETE TESTS for ALL then we can only accept that outbreaks WILL happen.
I mayself as a performer, can provide a minimum of FOUR months of clear tests to any female I work with. Maybe others should be more vigelant.
As we say we are not pointing the finger at anyone we merely say to ALL insist that you see and have a copy of the test cert of anyone male or female you work with. And makesure the cert is extensive. If you do virginal, oral, anal you can have a STD in any of those areas but not all!! So they should be tested.
Producers should read DUTY of CARE posting
Wishing everyone happy & safe performing
CandiceParis.com