Well when someone is arrogant and condescending to me, I tend to respond in kind.
If you can't take it Gentleman, best to give up being arrogant and condescending yourself
!wink!
Woolich Attack
Re: Essex Lad
David Johnson wrote:
> Essex Lad states
>
> "Fucking hell ? you two seriously need to get out more."
>
> And then describes me as "patronising".
>
> Pot, kettle, black?
Humour? Sense of? Not something lefties are renowned for... I admit.
> Essex Lad states
>
> "Fucking hell ? you two seriously need to get out more."
>
> And then describes me as "patronising".
>
> Pot, kettle, black?
Humour? Sense of? Not something lefties are renowned for... I admit.
-
David Johnson
- Posts: 7844
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Essex Lad
Obviously that works both ways and you appear so self-unaware, you don't even notice.
A regular trait in right wingers. !wink!
A regular trait in right wingers. !wink!
Interesting read
Interesting read (not for the idiot left obviously but others may find it interesting):
Andy's Interesting read
Indeed and just like the reportage on the death of that schoolteacher who started dressing as a woman before topping himself and the ridiculously over the top reaction from the coroner to the media coverage, a lot of hate crimes are nothing of the sort ? in the old days we called them crimes. The victim is to all intents and purposes irrelevant even if someone is beaten up for being gay or straight or black or Asian or whatever, the crime is the assault not the rationale behind it and should be punished accordingly and not given special treatment because of who the victim is.
-
David Johnson
- Posts: 7844
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
An interesting read, indeed, Andy
And you think that if there were attacks by Muslims on churches in the UK e.g. firebombing them, that would go virtually unreported in the press? Or if there were many, many demonstrations by hundreds of Muslims in overwhelmingly white areas, where they chanted "white scum" that this would not get commented upon?
The point is that in this world of 24 hr. media, the "idiot" right as much as the "idiot" left are going to exaggerate and inflate stories for their own socio-political ends. Just listen to all the crap that EDL self-appointed leader, Tommy Robinson spews out.
All any right-thinking person can do in this situation is try and sift the shit from the jewels of truth.
The point is that in this world of 24 hr. media, the "idiot" right as much as the "idiot" left are going to exaggerate and inflate stories for their own socio-political ends. Just listen to all the crap that EDL self-appointed leader, Tommy Robinson spews out.
All any right-thinking person can do in this situation is try and sift the shit from the jewels of truth.
Re: An interesting read, indeed, Andy
How many of us saw the reports featuring one of the terrorists spewing his hate on the streets, prior to it being used to show who he was after the event?
Why is it that someone making a comment on Facebook can get arrested for doing it yet some scum can rant all they want 'surrounded' by police but fuck all is done to them?
Why is it that the protesters against scum get kettled yet other protesters against scum are free to give as much abuse as they want and walk away?
Why is one persons jewel of truth another's complete and utter bollocks?
One other little snippet:
Tony Blair did a run of tweets the other day. It's was in 3 parts (due to 140 characters) with the first two in defence & about the faith being what it is etc.
(The usual bollocks you get when things like this happen, which isn't rocket science and what everyone (unless you're a complete arse wipe) knows but something the Political Elite feel the need to remind us about in some sort of deluded reassurance)
The third was a comment on the terrorist being a twat misusing the religion etc. (not the exact words).
This 3rd tweet was used by the left to proclaim that vile Blair was a bad as the idiot from the group with three letters, with the group with three letter using it as some sort of endorsement by Blair on what that section of the religion is.
Why is it that someone making a comment on Facebook can get arrested for doing it yet some scum can rant all they want 'surrounded' by police but fuck all is done to them?
Why is it that the protesters against scum get kettled yet other protesters against scum are free to give as much abuse as they want and walk away?
Why is one persons jewel of truth another's complete and utter bollocks?
One other little snippet:
Tony Blair did a run of tweets the other day. It's was in 3 parts (due to 140 characters) with the first two in defence & about the faith being what it is etc.
(The usual bollocks you get when things like this happen, which isn't rocket science and what everyone (unless you're a complete arse wipe) knows but something the Political Elite feel the need to remind us about in some sort of deluded reassurance)
The third was a comment on the terrorist being a twat misusing the religion etc. (not the exact words).
This 3rd tweet was used by the left to proclaim that vile Blair was a bad as the idiot from the group with three letters, with the group with three letter using it as some sort of endorsement by Blair on what that section of the religion is.
-
David Johnson
- Posts: 7844
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Andy
"Why is one persons jewel of truth another's complete and utter bollocks?"
Because many people seem unable to take a balanced view and instead come out with stuff like "I hate Islam", or "Islam is a vile religion" as if they have been hit over the head or stabbed by a copy of the Koran. Whilst others come out with crap like "All non-believers are evil pigs" etc. etc.
"How many of us saw the reports featuring one of the terrorists spewing his hate on the streets, prior to it being used to show who he was after the event?"
Dunno, but I have seen loads of clips of the Muslims at Luton, for example, just as I have seen loads of clips of EDL marches and chants on tele. Newsnight and the BBC News has shown a cross section of both over the years. If you are asking as you appear to be why we did not see a clip of Adebolajo prior to his disgusting crime is that he appears at that point to be just another brainwashed extremist, just as we tend not to see clips of brainwashed EDL members giving us the benefit of their lengthy political analysis on the 10 o'clock News. If say a member or ex-member of the BNP had planted a nail bomb in gay bars in Soho as was the case years back I am sure there would be footage shown after the event of him at BNP meetings or demos if available. Same applies to Adebolajo.
"Why is it that someone making a comment on Facebook can get arrested for doing it yet some scum can rant all they want 'surrounded' by police but fuck all is done to them?"
If you are talking about Adebolajo's rant, even the Daily Mail refers to the fact that "It is not known whether Adebolajo was part of this group, although at one point he had urged his supporters to avoid violence and be ?sincere to Allah? as well as "?Do not be scared of the filthy kuffar [non-believers]. They are pigs.?
Is this so much worse than hundreds of EDL or BNP marches with skinheads chanting in city centres Pakis go home or We are going to burn you out whilst making Nazi salutes?
Six and two threes I would have thought.
"Why is it that the protesters against scum get kettled yet other protesters against scum are free to give as much abuse as they want and walk away?"
Well the Unite against Fascism group that tend to come out and defend Muslims against the EDL/BNP initimidation didn't get any special treatment at the weekend in London
"Police officers ordered the group of around 300 protesters, linked to Unite Against Fascism (UAF), to move away and continue their protest further up the street but, after their demands were refused, officers moved in to make arrests. Despite most of the arrests being from among their ranks, UAF said it was pleased to have prevented the BNP's march and called it a "great victory".
As for Tony Blair, I stopped taking him seriously at all at the start of the Iraq War.
Because many people seem unable to take a balanced view and instead come out with stuff like "I hate Islam", or "Islam is a vile religion" as if they have been hit over the head or stabbed by a copy of the Koran. Whilst others come out with crap like "All non-believers are evil pigs" etc. etc.
"How many of us saw the reports featuring one of the terrorists spewing his hate on the streets, prior to it being used to show who he was after the event?"
Dunno, but I have seen loads of clips of the Muslims at Luton, for example, just as I have seen loads of clips of EDL marches and chants on tele. Newsnight and the BBC News has shown a cross section of both over the years. If you are asking as you appear to be why we did not see a clip of Adebolajo prior to his disgusting crime is that he appears at that point to be just another brainwashed extremist, just as we tend not to see clips of brainwashed EDL members giving us the benefit of their lengthy political analysis on the 10 o'clock News. If say a member or ex-member of the BNP had planted a nail bomb in gay bars in Soho as was the case years back I am sure there would be footage shown after the event of him at BNP meetings or demos if available. Same applies to Adebolajo.
"Why is it that someone making a comment on Facebook can get arrested for doing it yet some scum can rant all they want 'surrounded' by police but fuck all is done to them?"
If you are talking about Adebolajo's rant, even the Daily Mail refers to the fact that "It is not known whether Adebolajo was part of this group, although at one point he had urged his supporters to avoid violence and be ?sincere to Allah? as well as "?Do not be scared of the filthy kuffar [non-believers]. They are pigs.?
Is this so much worse than hundreds of EDL or BNP marches with skinheads chanting in city centres Pakis go home or We are going to burn you out whilst making Nazi salutes?
Six and two threes I would have thought.
"Why is it that the protesters against scum get kettled yet other protesters against scum are free to give as much abuse as they want and walk away?"
Well the Unite against Fascism group that tend to come out and defend Muslims against the EDL/BNP initimidation didn't get any special treatment at the weekend in London
"Police officers ordered the group of around 300 protesters, linked to Unite Against Fascism (UAF), to move away and continue their protest further up the street but, after their demands were refused, officers moved in to make arrests. Despite most of the arrests being from among their ranks, UAF said it was pleased to have prevented the BNP's march and called it a "great victory".
As for Tony Blair, I stopped taking him seriously at all at the start of the Iraq War.
Re: Andy
David Johnson wrote:
> As for Tony Blair, I stopped taking him seriously at all at the
> start of the Iraq War.
What Blair's opinion was is irrelevant the selective editing by the idiot left to make him into some sort of spokesperson for the group with three letter isn't.
The right doing it could & should have been seen for what it was. (Morons making a point) and dismissed.
Another little thing happened today:
A lot of women, mostly feminista's, have been hero worshipping Emily Davidson. (The suffragette who died from injuries she got when she was run over by the Kings horse while trying to put a votes for women sash on it).
Ms Davidson did a lot of things, as part of her campaigning, including fire bombing.
A community centre was, it appears, attacked by arsonists with Terror Police investigating it.
If it turns out that the morons with three letters did it will some, centuries from now, be hero worshipping people making a political point.
I hope not but....
> As for Tony Blair, I stopped taking him seriously at all at the
> start of the Iraq War.
What Blair's opinion was is irrelevant the selective editing by the idiot left to make him into some sort of spokesperson for the group with three letter isn't.
The right doing it could & should have been seen for what it was. (Morons making a point) and dismissed.
Another little thing happened today:
A lot of women, mostly feminista's, have been hero worshipping Emily Davidson. (The suffragette who died from injuries she got when she was run over by the Kings horse while trying to put a votes for women sash on it).
Ms Davidson did a lot of things, as part of her campaigning, including fire bombing.
A community centre was, it appears, attacked by arsonists with Terror Police investigating it.
If it turns out that the morons with three letters did it will some, centuries from now, be hero worshipping people making a political point.
I hope not but....