Barry George found Not Guilty

[Pervert]

!laugh!

[colonel]

He'll need to go elsewhere for his washing powder now, Alice.

[Deuce Bigolo]

You should know by now JJ thinks every email deserves the attention you would give a love letter to your long lost sweetheart

[mrmcfister]

In the screws today he continues to be weird.Dont care if he is innocent.He deserved 8 yrs for attempt rape/indecent assault/harrassment..like I said absence of guilt does not mean innocence..he may get about ?20 compensation after all he always worked didn't he..oh no that was someone else..he's got lots of nbenefir checks coming..

[Ace]

Said from the off that Bazza was innocent, a right fix up

[Jonone]

According to your logic Mr. McFister anyone that earns more than you is 'better' and more worthy than you. Is that so ?

People like you are contemptuous of people who you feel superior too and fawning and deferential to the people who you think are superior, and yet you only ever express opinions about the former. You're always strangely quiet about the latter. What a way to live !

[one eyed jack]

It always strikes me as ignorant when people assume someone is guilty when they have no first hand evidence to back it up. Like OJ...Did he do it? Did he not? I have no clue.

Ask a woman and a bigot then he is guilty. Ask a black man and he isnt. Ask me and I would say it certainly looks that way but I dont know for sure.

Flat Eric must know something we dont. If you do then tell it then get on the bus with all the other people that think the same and get the guy retried....Thing is no ones going there because no one can be bothered because deep down- they lack the ccourage of their convictions. i think this is linked to apathy also.

Smart lawyers can get you off only so much but its down to the judge to make the difficult choice to steer everyone in the direction of a defendants freedom.

This Barry George geezer. I have no idea if he is inncoent and like many have said being weird doesnt make you guilty but I htink its funny that since people have someone which could be anyone, theyve latched onto the idea that he is guilty.

People should really try to keep an open mind not to be swayed by the media. It is the media that have the globe mentally enslaved to bull shit. Its turning your brains to mush where you cant think for yourselves anymore. Or so it seems thats what those in power would like to hope.

Its working by the looks of things.

[mrmcfister]

Fucking hell Jonone..you have certainly made a leap there.The bloke's a creep whether he did it or not.Read about about him on Wiki and its links for instance and you'll see the quality of the man.Not sure if you are male or female but if the latter then if you were subject of one of his stalkings then you may not be so willing to stand up for him...oh and by the way his defence made a lot of low his IQ and his alleged inability to plan..read todays screws and it gives another example of his strange behaviour towards vulnerable women

[Robches]

Alice In Blunderland wrote:

> Stop fucking swearing. You fucking melonfarmer. I think your
> intelligence has to be called into question by your constant
> going on about this, ignore any scientific evidence it is
> irrelevant, I believe the evidence points to his guilt.

I think your intelligence is called into question because you keep going on about DNA evidence which does not exist you utter fucking tool. Are you a complete fuckwit, or will you have the grace to accept there is not and never was any fucking DNA evidence?

[Jonone]

He's someone with a low IQ, learning disabilities and epilepsy. Nevertheless he has a male ego which expresses itself in awkward and inappropriate ways. 'Stalking' and 'harrassment' are emotive terms and as such great for building a prosecution case around. I repeat, his behaviour may well have been inappropriate but if you go to any large office with a mixed staff and ask the females if there is a 'sex pest' I dare say they'll point one out to you. Some people are inappropriate and don't understand social norms around conventional behaviour and personal space. This was part of Barry George's problem, but in itself it's not indicative of murderous intent or a prelude to the act of murder. George compounded this with compulsions such as following women and photographing them. Again, this is wrong however it's arguable that few of these films were ever developed which, if this is the case, puts a different slant on his behaviour. It doesn't mitigate it but it does reveal his disordered thinking. Furthermore if these behaviours were sustained why wasn't Barry George prosecuted and 'bound over' to prevent their re-occurrence ?

I don't really understand your desire to cast Barry George as a 'creep' and the undercurrent of your first post is one of jealousy that, after losing eight years of his life, he might get some compensation. Whether or not those eight years would otherwise have been passed productively (as judged by yourself) is not the issue but merely the oportunity for a mean spirited dig.

Both the Police and CPS declared themselves to be 'disappointed' with Friday's verdict. Have you for a moment reflected on how disappointed Barry George has been every day of the last eight years, or have you dehumanized him to the point where you can't attribute feelings to him ?