Page 9 of 12
Re: holly lockett/rose
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 9:45 am
by winston69
It's gone
Re: holly lockett/rose
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 10:27 am
by krisman
Thought it might considering the high amount of views the image had.
I don't really get why the model openly advertised to do adult work, but never shows her face in any of the stuff she shoots.
I can understand worrying about it coming back to haunt her etc etc, but surely just don't shoot to adult levels then.
Re: holly lockett/rose
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 4:01 pm
by Luke789
sexy
Re: holly lockett/rose
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 4:21 pm
by krisman
Fuck off luke
Re: holly lockett/rose
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 5:42 pm
by LucyAkhurst
That?s bizarre, why take a picture you don?t want to be seen and appreciated ?
Re: holly lockett/rose
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2017 5:33 am
by winston69
Money
Re: holly lockett/rose
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 7:13 am
by Kebabfan
No idea how she gets away with charging ?80 per hour for adult shoots when she doesn't show her face. There are much better looking models who charge a lot less than that. Perhaps each shoot is guaranteed a happy ending?
Re: holly lockett/rose
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 8:58 am
by winston69
Always wondered myself.
Re: holly lockett/rose
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 10:17 am
by BreastLover22
Yes, her rates are rediculous. How any model can think they are worth ?1 or more a minute is beyond me.
Re: holly lockett/rose
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 4:55 pm
by winston69
If my math is right, your post reeks of sarcasm. Those would be good rates I reckon...but to hide one's face? That's when those rates start looking quite odd.
