egafd.com

warren zevon rip wrote:

> warren zevon rip wrote (badly, again):
>
>
> > 5) The balance between my right not to be offended, and your
> > right to be OFFENSIVE is indeed an incredibly difficult and
> > subtle one.

Are you saying that the girls' behaviour was offensive??!!

"The only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about."

Oscar Wilde (Irish Poet, Novelist, Dramatist and Critic, 1854-1900)

Oh my lord....Well, I count myself as quite an experienced guy as regards life and it's subtle mysteries! When it comes to hypocrites I have encountered some amazing examples over the years

BUT......................................................................!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

MS PARKER, after watching you parade the back alleys and traffic islands of Birmingham stark bloody naked, pissing yourself and all on a DVD WITH THE CONCEPT OF PUBLIC FLASHING AS IT'S SELLING POINT....I have to award you the Limey Dick All-Time PLATINUM HYPOCRISY TROPHY...Jesus, girl...why step in a puddle when you can dive headlong into the sea eh? LOL!

This has to be one of the funniest things I have ever enjoyed in all my life, superb!

Oh and JB, nicely underlines my point about the value of 'research' too!

I suggest anybody who has contributed to this thread, does not miss the chance to examine this wonderful piece of campaigning porn...Well Done Gemma, great work!

Limey Dick

Rather a weak attempt this...Pointing out that kids may find their parents DVD'S does not constitute morally judging Gemma at all. It merely points out a fact which all porn models have to accept, i.e their work may find it's way into the hands or 'eyes' of kids.

Louiza is not judging Gemma with this, just showing her that her stance is rather hypocritical...

Limey Dick

The trouble with this posting is that it displays perfectly the 'Little Englander' approach that still dogs this island both culturally and intellectually....

Not political???

Are you kidding? So an act which inspires people to jam up up a forum with references to legislation passed by the Government, does not constitute a political debate....Come on mate, think carefully about what you say, before you say it.

Secondly, try getting two women to dance like that in certain countries and see how long it is before some foaming-at-the mouth Religous/Political Moral Guardian is throwing them into prison and labelling them as a moral affront to humanity...

Dear, dear.

Limey Dick

PS Have you checked out Gemma's Flashing in Birmingham video on Strictly Broadband's thread?

Looks like that's it then?

Nice one Gemma!

This beggars belief...

Mate, you post on a porn forum and you try to imply that Louiza and Lala do not have the right to describe themselves as 'Black' Babes?

In this sense it is being used as an adjective to describe a product featuring two black babes indulging in girl/girl action with each other.

Seeing as there a considerable amount of people who migh get turned on by the thought of such a sexual union, hence the description.

We of course apologise if being this graphic has offended you.

Limey Dick

Errr yes the argument has been about indecency since the start ?.. remember the second post in the thread ???

?Make no wonder she was pissed off,
2.30pm on a saturday with kids and shoppers around??



I don?t think children are damaged by the sight of breasts per se, and this is why breast feeding in public is not illegal. However flaunting tits and dressed in porn clothes during the day in a public place is illegal and its called indecent exposure. That?s the law in this country SB there is no debate on that. Its nothing to do with Iran or any other country you?re fond of quoting morals and laws from. I suggest you get up to scratch or the laws in your own country first. Before you say yet again, that laws must be pushed to their boundries, I can already see that you personally do that with your site registered in london and with no warning page.


Limey Dick, it wasn?t the pointing out that kids might find their parents DVDs that was morally judging. Yet again you miss the point. Read on a bit more to the next sentence ? Louiza added about Gemma ?She does not care that kids might end up watching her in action!? ?. Do you see ? ?she does not care?, that is morally judging that Gemma does not care. You can?t get anymore morally judging than assuming you know someones thoughts and cares are bad. If you can?t understand that, there is no hope.

Porn Clothes....Pls Define....Roberto Rimmero esq!!!