egafd.com

my thoughts exactly

ok

this may surprise you butttt some of the things you see and hear on line ARE NOT TRUE.

I tell a different story in every single interview I do. The first interview I ever did 'I will never do boy girl' well yah. Because if people think I won't ever do it, it's much more exciting when I do.

WAH WAH WAH WAH WAH

STOP CRYING.


No matter what anyone shoots they will never win, there is porn out there for EVERYONE. The vibe I'm getting is that maybe you are buying the wrong porn.. clearly Evil Angel and foot fetish sites are not for you.

There is LOADS of porn without anal, I know, I do anal and I still get booked for a fuck ton of non anal scenes. In the UK I am one of maybe 3 girls that actually take it in the ass on camera, also, Anal is not 'just wrong'. I enjoy it. A lot of people enjoy it. Just because YOU don't like it, does not make it wrong.

Boobs.
There are loads of girls without fake boobs, in the Uk, not so many but still some, look abroad , Europe and america have some stunning natural girls.


Tattoos. Again, there are TONS of girls without them, me being one, also, I think it is just plain rude to call a girl braindead because she CHOSE to have tattoos, I think they look nice on a lot of girls actually, not what I would choose, I prefer to keep myself natural. But, what someone choses to do with their own body is really none of your business. And I certainly would not go as far as to say 'WOMEN WITH TATTOOS ARE BRAINDEAD'

Feet, I don't have a foot fetish, I like wearing nice shoes, but unfortunately for you there are a lot of people out there that like feet. I would say my scenes are 50/50 whether I wear shoes or not.

The spitting, again, you are clearly buying the WRONG porn, might I recommend some sites for you? Joybear, sex art, 21 naturals, new sensations, xconfessions.


There is so much porn, so many niches, I can't even believe how much there is out there, with so many girls and so many companies, every single person should be able to find something to get them off. From the reality style gonzo real couples and fake agent, through to elaborate high budget glamour like Harmony and Elegant Angel, bouncy big boobs on Brazzers, straight up hardcore like Killergram and Hands on Hardcore and Devils film and Pure, beautiful Erotica on Joybear and Sex Art and Erika Lust, tease and stunning solos with the likes of Twistys and Holly Randall, Extremeeeee anal at Evil angel, every fetish ever ?Kink.com?. house of taboo. Live interactive, on any and all levels, Shebang, Babestation, Immoral. A plethora of different sites catering for pretty much every niche?.
I give up really I do, every time I read something online it's just people bitching and complaining about porn! You know, we all pour everything in to our scenes, but the majority still find something to bitch and complain about. It is honestly so boring. One day I hope to sign on to a forum and see loads of positive threads about all the awesome different porn and different girls we have on offer these days, and how its amazing, that in an industry dying on its ass because of the torrent sites you mentioned, we as performers and the companies that hire us are able to continue making these movies for you to tear apart on porn forums.



Andddd I'm out.




Ps. Thanks to the people that don't bitch and moan. I'm aware some of you do exist. And I also know a lot of you do say lovely things. But please bare in mind we do read what is said about us, not just me, we all do. I just like to vocalise.

WORD.


oh. and I see my partner in crime Lexi has already been here telling you whats what.

samanthabentley wrote:

> No matter what anyone shoots they will never win, there is porn
> out there for EVERYONE.

I agree that you can never please everyone, there will always be those that like something and those that don't. However it's the majority opinion that counts and the majority clearly dislike tattoos, boob jobs etc.

> There is LOADS of porn without anal, I know, I do anal and I
> still get booked for a fuck ton of non anal scenes.

There used to be. I've bought plenty of DVD's in recent years where there was no indication of there being anal, only to be disgusted, disappointed and angry at being ripped off because nearly every scene included anal.

> In the UK I
> am one of maybe 3 girls that actually take it in the ass on
> camera, also, Anal is not 'just wrong'. I enjoy it. A lot of
> people enjoy it. Just because YOU don't like it, does not make
> it wrong.

It isn't wrong because I don't like it, it is wrong because it's an evil act, it is not what our creator intended and those who partake in such evil will be punished, simple as that. You enjoy it, fine, but most of us don't want to see it and have it forced upon us.

>
> Boobs.
> There are loads of girls without fake boobs, in the Uk, not so
> many but still some, look abroad , Europe and america have some
> stunning natural girls.

Absolutely, there are some gorgeous girls out there, but they are unfortunately a minority these days.

>
> Tattoos. Again, there are TONS of girls without them, me being
> one, also, I think it is just plain rude to call a girl
> braindead because she CHOSE to have tattoos, I think they look
> nice on a lot of girls actually, not what I would choose, I
> prefer to keep myself natural. But, what someone choses to do
> with their own body is really none of your business. And I
> certainly would not go as far as to say 'WOMEN WITH TATTOOS ARE
> BRAINDEAD'

I accept that it's none of my business if a girl wishes to ruin herself with grafitti, if someone wishes to destroy their appearance like that then yeah they are entitled to do so, but I do not want to have to see it, they need to keep covered up.

>
> Feet, I don't have a foot fetish, I like wearing nice shoes,
> but unfortunately for you there are a lot of people out there
> that like feet. I would say my scenes are 50/50 whether I wear
> shoes or not.

I appreciate that there are plenty of people that do like bare feet, more of an even split amongst men as to whether it's a turn on or turn off. My preference is for girls to wear shoes and the minute those shoes come off it just kills everything for me, I also want to see the shoes in shot with a full view rather than close-ups, the way it used to be done in the good ol days. What bugs me, is you'll see a DVD cover or a sample pic or clip for an online scene and the girl is wearing shoes and looks fantastic (obviously companies will use the best image they can to sell a product) but the action doesn't match the cover, the shoes either come off or don't come into view, therefore it's false advertising designed to rip people off.

>
> The spitting, again, you are clearly buying the WRONG porn,
> might I recommend some sites for you? Joybear, sex art, 21
> naturals, new sensations, xconfessions.

Trust me, it is something that is popping up far too often now.



> I give up really I do, every time I read something online it's
> just people bitching and complaining about porn! You know, we
> all pour everything in to our scenes, but the majority still
> find something to bitch and complain about. It is honestly so
> boring. One day I hope to sign on to a forum and see loads of
> positive threads about all the awesome different porn and
> different girls we have on offer these days, and how its
> amazing, that in an industry dying on its ass because of the
> torrent sites you mentioned, we as performers and the companies
> that hire us are able to continue making these movies for you
> to tear apart on porn forums.
>
>

What happened to the customer is always right? You want people to just accept crap, to accept being ripped off, and say nothing? We have a right to our opinions and give feedback and we would like to think that producers and the industry as a whole would be taking on board all feedback from customers and potential customers whether that feedback is positive or negative.

one eyed jack wrote:

> While I agree with all that Lexi has said I can only defend
> some of the zero production values and cheap location/ gonzo
> fare that is prevalent in UK porn. I thik there are some of us
> us that have captured some genuinely fun and derring do that is
> selom seen on higher end productions.
>

I would agree. I don't give a hoot about locations and budgets and would be very surprised if there are many guys that do. When you're watching porn, I would think the last thing you're doing is checking out the location that's used. I've seen some great low budget stuff and some awful high budget stuff, the investment in the production is not what matters.

> Maybe the glut of all the bad stuff is born from this cheap,
> tfp, content swap culture I personally think is killing decent
> porn from being made because the mentality is throwaway whereas
> the gonzo zero budget stuff was done with a sense of fun but
> the performers were always reasonably paid and well treated
> even if we didnt have make up artists an studios to work out
> of.
>
>

You're probably right about the tfp culture. I remember some guys several years ago (apologies if I'm wrong but if memory serves me correct I think Peter H and Roy R) saying how tfp would kill the industry and drive the quality models away, and I guess they were right. It makes sense, models in the past could probably make a decent living by supplementing professional work working for amateurs but with so many of the amateurs now unprepared to pay and expecting to tfp and get models free then the industry doesn't have the same lure. The higher standard of girl isn't there because the work and the money isn't there.

But Samantha you're missing the point.

There might be girls out there without tattoos and boob jobs but they are few and far between. The thing is a lot of girls look fantastic without all the modifications. Look at Angel Long. I bought all her DVD's, subscribed to her site and wanked myself silly to her. But she destroyed herself with all the tattoos and now i can't even bear to look at her. And a lot of people feel the same way. So, yeah, it is a girls right to do it but be prepared for the consequences and vitriol.

You make your money off of us; the customers. We should be allowed to say what we do and don't like. Take yourself for example. You are the most stunning UK girl in the industry at the minute. I love your stuff. But if you covered yourself in tattoos and got a boob job then bye from me and my wallet. And a huge number of other fans as well.

First things first.

Samantha Bentley: I literally just found out about you yesterday, before seeing your posts on here. I was on Killergram and saw your picture advertising KG Live and my jaw dropped. A few searches later and Im now a big fan. You are unbelievably sexy and so naughty too. You are what persuaded me to join kink.

Now onto you RaymondT: I'm not sure if this is just trolling, or if you really do believe the stuff that's flying out of your mouth (which is worse I think) but I think you need a few hard truths.

Ok fair enough, Anal isn't for everyone. Everyone has different desires and what may seem off-putting for you, might be a turn on for others. But I really don't get you coming onto these boards preaching about how it is evil and not what our creator intended. Im pretty sure that should our creator give a fuck, he wouldn't be too thrilled with your porn habits. Kind of hypocritical to preach morality on a porn forum don't you think? Technically aren't you coveting you neighbours wife when you watch porn?
I do sympathise with buying something which has anal sex and doesn't tell the buyer though, but that is why I only use certain websites that advertise what is in their scenes.

Onto Tattoos, again I do agree that some models have ruined their bodies by going totally overboard and covering themselves, but most of them keep it fairly simple (Holly Michaels with that cute pair of lips on her pelvis for example). You are right, it is your opinion, but slamming models for doing what they want with their body is a little judgemental. Funny how you ignore that part about judging people in the bible.

Breast implants, just like tattoos, when done right can look good and when done wrong can look really bad. I don't know everyones personal taste but I think its safe to say that if people didn't want to see women with fake breasts, then models wouldn't be getting them.

I also would think before you spout of what the "majority" and what "most people" want. On what do you base your opinion that you know more than others what the majority want? You certainly do not speak for me, so that's one already.

As far as the customer always being right, you might want to get yourself out of the 50s with that mentality. Responsible customers (like myself) do basic research into the porn I buy. I want to know which scenes have certain models, so I only frequent sites that list the models name. There are plenty of sites that list what scenes have anal in them, so you know what not to watch.

Also, calling what these models do "crap" is out of line.

sam, if you ever need your arse fucking and don't want to put anyone at risk of 'punishment' i am available. I figure i'm already done for so i can't be 'punished' more than once. and at least i'd subsequently be providing employment for an otherwise underused sadist.

3SS wrote:

> Ok fair enough, Anal isn't for everyone. Everyone has different
> desires and what may seem off-putting for you, might be a turn
> on for others. But I really don't get you coming onto these
> boards preaching about how it is evil and not what our creator
> intended. Im pretty sure that should our creator give a fuck,
> he wouldn't be too thrilled with your porn habits. Kind of
> hypocritical to preach morality on a porn forum don't you
> think? Technically aren't you coveting you neighbours wife when
> you watch porn?

Not preaching, simply stating a fact.

Different people may hold different thoughts on this, but I don't think porn is a sin. Nudity and straight sex are perfectly normal, without sex we wouldn't be here. Viewing porn is not coveting, this commandment forbids the desire for adultery but I have no wish or desire to commit adultery or take what doesn't belong to me.

> Onto Tattoos, again I do agree that some models have ruined
> their bodies by going totally overboard and covering
> themselves, but most of them keep it fairly simple (Holly
> Michaels with that cute pair of lips on her pelvis for
> example). You are right, it is your opinion, but slamming
> models for doing what they want with their body is a little
> judgemental. Funny how you ignore that part about judging
> people in the bible.

I am stating it is a turn off and something I do not wish to see. With regard a majority view, there have been several surveys and it was only a few weeks back it was on the news that tattoos had been voted by men to be the number one turn off, if I remember correctly 40% of men voted it the number one turn off and around 80% listed it in their top 5 turn offs. I know surveys can often be unreliable due to the numbers involved, but several surveys all giving similar results indicates reliability and proof that the majority of men do find tattoos a huge turn off.


> As far as the customer always being right, you might want to
> get yourself out of the 50s with that mentality. Responsible
> customers (like myself) do basic research into the porn I buy.
> I want to know which scenes have certain models, so I only
> frequent sites that list the models name. There are plenty of
> sites that list what scenes have anal in them, so you know what
> not to watch.

All the research in the world offers no guarantee. That is why I now do not buy until I've seen, I download a torrent, if I don't like I delete, if I do like then I delete also and then go pay for it legally.

The customer may not necessarily always be right but if a company wants to maximise turn over and profit and last the test of time then they do need to listen to the opinions of the customer. If you buy something from your supermarket and on opening it at home find that it's gone off, would you expect the supermarket to tell you to sod off because you should've done your research before buying, or would you expect them to apologise and either replace or refund? If you buy a new tv and it breaks down after a week, do you want the retailer to say go away because you should've done your research before buying or do you want the retailer to replace or refund?