Page 7 of 7
Re: Should we name no shows and timewasters?
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 7:22 am
by satine spark
I say no, it's just pointless.
Re: Should we name no shows and timewasters?
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 9:18 am
by one eyed jack
You said no Be seen here but you didnt vote.
Im not going to do a post count for everyone that says yes. Much easier to see the votes.
I have made the votes public so that people can see who is industry versus those who are not.
No offence to the fans is meant but i think this has more validity with the people it is aimed at.
I understand that people dont want to vote if they cannot remain anonymous as one poster stated on here. I have no idea if Twingo is actually a producer or not is how anonymous he is to me.
Again, no offence meant to you Twingo. You might be a bigger producer than most which is why if you voted it might lend some credibility to your vote.
Re: Should we name no shows and timewasters?
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 9:28 am
by JB
Yes, name and shame (and likewise, you should post positive reports too). Why not have an ebay-style points system where models can earn positive and negative scores? That way if a girl has shown up 19 times out of 20 she'll have a good score, even if she's pissed off one producer.
People won't take libel action, it's just not practical. At the worst, if a dishonest report gets online, the model will get a public apology/retraction.
Re: Should we name no shows and timewasters?
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 9:31 am
by one eyed jack
Be Seen Here
If you said no here on BGAFD thats fine but it wont be counted as BGAFD have nothig to do with this aspect which will be discussed on the producers forum.
So far most are in favour against one producer.
Satine, its not pointless at all. People can find out for themselves who is unreliable before they book them
If someone has a track record then people will less likely book those models or accept jobs from chronic timewasters.
I dont think the majority who have voted deem it pointless at all
Will it change the business? Probably not but at least repeat offending models and producers wil understand why no one wants to work with them and this is going on so much at the moment it is beyond a joke so you could say we are responding to the demand of theindustry itself.
Besides its not costing us anything and is another resource to help people about their business.
Would you find it pointless joining the models forum and getting the heads up who the dodgy togs are as well?
Re: Should we name no shows and timewasters?
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 9:33 am
by one eyed jack
People post gushing reports all the time Jez...Dont you read them on here LOL
Re: Should we name no shows and timewasters?
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 7:02 pm
by Charbbw
I am really up for it and would have no trouble in naming and shaming these tossers. Its about time too!
Allow me to go through my emails and name all those tossers!
Re: Should we name no shows and timewasters?
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 8:06 pm
by one eyed jack
Feel free Charbbw
Re: Should we name no shows and timewasters?
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 8:09 pm
by one eyed jack
Oh dear I noticed you advertise on Be Seen Here...He really doesnt like UKAP (probably me too)...Oh well, we dont have any issue with him but he seems to hate the idea we are doing this.