Page 7 of 7

Re: www.ukporn-name-and-shame.com

Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 9:06 pm
by Naomixxx
Hi Samsung,

I go to the Charring Cross clinic based in Victoria and Id is checked when a cert is issued, not before being tested.

Naomi

Re: www.ukporn-name-and-shame.com

Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 8:54 am
by randyandy
In my previous reply I said I give up and will stick to looking at tits in future, hence the comment re Lana.

!love!


Re: www.ukporn-name-and-shame.com

Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 5:16 am
by Emily Cartwright
Mr Mark wrote:

> Thanks for the excellent responses to date - appreciated.
>
> Be-Seen-Here said: "From previous posts I gather you've been
> subjected to some kind of campaign against you."
>
> Nope, no more so than anyone else. A certain same troll jumps
> out for a 'sneak attack' occasionally, on a select few of us
> who also happen to post on a more general modelling forum, but
> that's just a case of 'shit happens'. Certainly no reason for
> this post, which relates to a closed forum for those working in
> the porn industry, not the odd malicious outsider.
>
> The main reason for considering this kind of forum is in my
> first post:
>
> // The idea is to name those that perform while knowing they
> have STI's, who escort without protection, who fake certs and
> who spread rumours about other performers. //
>
> Totally agree that it could be hell to moderate and could have
> far reaching consequences.
>
> It's worth the discussion though, simply because we do not have
> a means of discussing these kind of thorny issues in a closed
> arena, and from every model I know and talk to currently
> worrying about STI's / who is getting up to god know's what /
> who is currently spreading rumours about them etc there's an
> audience for this.
>
> Any more thoughts?
>
> Having slept on this, my opinions are that this could just be
> too much to administrate/moderate, although like I say, access
> would be by application only, and wouldn't be granted to every
> Tom, Dick and Harry who's made one film and now sees themselves
> as an adult performer or producer...
>
> Difficult one. The 'having balls' bit doesn't worry me; the
> 'potential damage to careers' fear does however.
>
> Could turn into an online Fight Club, rather than anything
> else.
>
>

Hey Mark,

As someone who has had completely false claims made against me by a so-called established professional who had absolutely no qualms about publicly libelling me, I'd encourage you to dispense with the idea.

There are simply too many arseholes working in this business to avoid someone getting hurt who doesn't deserve it. I'm certainly not the only one who has been on the receiving end of absolutely groundless bullshit, and giving people a vehicle to rant about who is a flake, who lets you down, who has the clap, who is a pervert, who is an abusive psychopathic mysogynist and so on is leaving it open for people with dishonest agendas to come along and use it to settle personal scores.

And you're just too nice of a guy to waste your time screening people like that. !grin!

Em x