Page 7 of 7
Re: See Bluebird Is Taken Over
Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 9:37 pm
by awgazzm69
it was always shit anyway i dunno why anybody even talks about them all hot air and bollux the lot of em
new newbies
Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 7:07 am
by bgafdfan
you missed 2..?
Re: See Bluebird Is Taken Over
Posted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 2:50 pm
by mybeautifultease
I've seen probably their biggest blockbusters that were hyped to hell; Bonny and Clide and Bat Fxxx, must say they are very well produced and inspiring in that sense but as a porn film I wasn't that rocked.
Vivid's Batman was a better attempt if not as well produced.
I hope Bluebird manage to turn its misfortune around, if in deed it is in misfortune.
Re: Chloe Cruize:
Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 6:45 am
by RichfetisH
Re: See Bluebird Is Taken Over
Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 8:02 am
by one eyed jack
MBT wrote:
..as a porn film I wasn't that rocked.
This was the core of what i said when everyone was banging the drum for what a great trailer it was.
It was.
Thing is, as a porn film I'd like the sex to match the scope of the film and take priority over it. Not to be the background to it.
I havent seen the movie but while I think the trailer is great, unfortunately its like Play Boy...coffee table porn thats nice to look at but you can't bang one out to.
Re: See Bluebird Is Taken Over
Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 10:28 am
by jj
I've seen them and they have two major flaws: too many close-ups [at the
expense of full-body shots], and too many scenes are multi-performer- the dog
can't see the rabbit for more than a few seconds at a time.
B+C was a bit of a letdown after all the hype- and Nat only has two main scenes.